Literature DB >> 17847601

Evaluating the therapeutic misconception.

Franklin G Miller1, Steven Joffe.   

Abstract

The "therapeutic misconception", described by Paul Appelbaum and colleagues more than 20 years ago, refers to the tendency of participants in clinical trials to confuse the design and conduct of research with personalized medical care. Although the "therapeutic misconception" has become a term of art in research ethics, little systematic attention has been devoted to the ethical significance of this phenomenon. This article examines critically the way in which Appelbaum and colleagues formulate what is at stake in the therapeutic misconception, paying particular attention to assumptions and implications that clinical trial participation disadvantages research participants as compared with receiving standard medical care. After clarifying the ethical significance of the therapeutic misconception with respect to the decision making of patients, we offer policy recommendations for obtaining informed consent to participation in clinical trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17847601     DOI: 10.1353/ken.2006.0025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kennedy Inst Ethics J        ISSN: 1054-6863


  15 in total

Review 1.  Ethical concerns about non-active conditions in smoking cessation trials and methods to decrease such concerns.

Authors:  John R Hughes
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2008-12-06       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  The therapeutic misconception: not just for patients.

Authors:  Dana J Lawrence
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2008-08

3.  Biobank participation and returning research results: perspectives from a deliberative engagement in South Side Chicago.

Authors:  Amy A Lemke; Colin Halverson; Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Therapeutic misconception, misestimation, and optimism in participants enrolled in phase 1 trials.

Authors:  Rebecca D Pentz; Margaret White; R Donald Harvey; Zachary Luke Farmer; Yuan Liu; Colleen Lewis; Olga Dashevskaya; Taofeek Owonikoko; Fadlo R Khuri
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Clinical trial participation as part of end-of-life cancer care: associations with medical care and quality of life near death.

Authors:  Andrea C Enzinger; Baohui Zhang; Jane C Weeks; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2013-10-05       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  What research ethics should learn from genomics and society research: lessons from the ELSI Congress of 2011.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; Eric T Juengst; Nancy M P King; Kristine Kuczynski; Marsha Michie
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Developing a Model of the Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Kathleen A Knafl; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Therese S Richmond; Christine Grady; Claiborne Miller-Davis; Gwenyth R Wallen
Journal:  AJOB Prim Res       Date:  2012

Review 8.  [Ethical questions in clinical research with the mentally ill].

Authors:  H Helmchen
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Therapeutic misconception in research subjects: development and validation of a measure.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Milena Anatchkova; Karen Albert; Laura B Dunn; Charles W Lidz
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.486

10.  Ethical challenges in integrating patient-care with clinical research in a resource-limited setting: perspectives from Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Moses Laman; William Pomat; Peter Siba; Inoni Betuela
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 2.652

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.