Literature DB >> 23289702

What research ethics should learn from genomics and society research: lessons from the ELSI Congress of 2011.

Gail E Henderson1, Eric T Juengst, Nancy M P King, Kristine Kuczynski, Marsha Michie.   

Abstract

Research on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of human genomics has devoted significant attention to the research ethics issues that arise from genomic science as it moves through the translational process. Given the prominence of these issues in today's debates over the state of research ethics overall, these studies are well positioned to contribute important data, contextual considerations, and policy arguments to the wider research ethics community's deliberations, and ultimately to develop a research ethics that can help guide biomedicine's future. In this essay, we illustrate this thesis through an analytic summary of the research presented at the 2011 ELSI Congress, an international meeting of genomics and society researchers. We identify three pivotal factors currently shaping genomic research, its clinical translation, and its societal implications: (1) the increasingly blurred boundary between research and treatment; (2) uncertainty--that is, the indefinite, indeterminate, and incomplete nature of much genomic information and the challenges that arise from making meaning and use of it; and (3) the role of negotiations between multiple scientific and non-scientific stakeholders in setting the priorities for and direction of biomedical research, as it is increasingly conducted "in the public square."
© 2012 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23289702      PMCID: PMC4103651          DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00728.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  36 in total

Review 1.  Race, ethnicity, and genomics: social classifications as proxies of biological heterogeneity.

Authors:  Morris W Foster; Richard R Sharp
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Phase I cancer trials. A collusion of misunderstanding.

Authors:  M Miller
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2000 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.683

3.  The ubiquity and utility of the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  Rebecca Dresser
Journal:  Soc Philos Policy       Date:  2002

4.  Assessing benefits in clinical research: why diversity in benefit assessment can be risky.

Authors:  Larry R Churchill; Daniel K Nelson; Gail E Henderson; Nancy M P King; Arlene M Davis; Erin Leahey; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 May-Jun

5.  Misunderstanding in clinical research: distinguishing therapeutic misconception, therapeutic misestimation, and therapeutic optimism.

Authors:  Sam Horng; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

6.  The importance of race and ethnic background in biomedical research and clinical practice.

Authors:  Esteban González Burchard; Elad Ziv; Natasha Coyle; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Hua Tang; Andrew J Karter; Joanna L Mountain; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Dean Sheppard; Neil Risch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Race and genomics.

Authors:  Richard S Cooper; Jay S Kaufman; Ryk Ward
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-03-20       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Do the print media "hype" genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers.

Authors:  Tania M Bubela; Timothy A Caulfield
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Views of American oncologists about the purposes of clinical trials.

Authors:  Steven Joffe; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda.

Authors:  William J Sutherland; Laura Bellingan; Jim R Bellingham; Jason J Blackstock; Robert M Bloomfield; Michael Bravo; Victoria M Cadman; David D Cleevely; Andy Clements; Anthony S Cohen; David R Cope; Arthur A Daemmrich; Cristina Devecchi; Laura Diaz Anadon; Simon Denegri; Robert Doubleday; Nicholas R Dusic; Robert J Evans; Wai Y Feng; H Charles J Godfray; Paul Harris; Sue E Hartley; Alison J Hester; John Holmes; Alan Hughes; Mike Hulme; Colin Irwin; Richard C Jennings; Gary S Kass; Peter Littlejohns; Theresa M Marteau; Glenn McKee; Erik P Millstone; William J Nuttall; Susan Owens; Miles M Parker; Sarah Pearson; Judith Petts; Richard Ploszek; Andrew S Pullin; Graeme Reid; Keith S Richards; John G Robinson; Louise Shaxson; Leonor Sierra; Beck G Smith; David J Spiegelhalter; Jack Stilgoe; Andy Stirling; Christopher P Tyler; David E Winickoff; Ron L Zimmern
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  11 in total

1.  Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?

Authors:  Anya E R Prince; John M Conley; Arlene M Davis; Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz; R Jean Cadigan
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Canadian Research Ethics Board Leadership Attitudes to the Return of Genetic Research Results to Individuals and Their Families.

Authors:  Conrad V Fernandez; P Pearl O'Rourke; Laura M Beskow
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 3.  Review: Genetic research on alcohol use outcomes in African American populations: A review of the literature, associated challenges, and implications.

Authors:  Danielle M Dick; Peter Barr; Mignonne Guy; Aashir Nasim; Denise Scott
Journal:  Am J Addict       Date:  2017-02-27

Review 4.  Stakeholder Engagement in HIV Cure Research: Lessons Learned from Other HIV Interventions and the Way Forward.

Authors:  Ying-Ru Lo; Carissa Chu; Jintanat Ananworanich; Jean-Louis Excler; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  AIDS Patient Care STDS       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 5.078

5.  Grand challenge: ELSI in a changing global environment.

Authors:  Dov Greenbaum
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2013-08-16       Impact factor: 4.599

6.  Genomic data-sharing: what will be our legacy?

Authors:  Shawneequa Callier; Rajah Husain; Rachel Simpson
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 4.599

7.  Navigating social and ethical challenges of biobanking for human microbiome research.

Authors:  Kim H Chuong; David M Hwang; D Elizabeth Tullis; Valerie J Waters; Yvonne C W Yau; David S Guttman; Kieran C O'Doherty
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Community Perspectives on Communicating About Precision Medicine in an Alaska Native Tribal Health Care System.

Authors:  R Brian Woodbury; Julie A Beans; Kyle A Wark; Paul Spicer; Vanessa Y Hiratsuka
Journal:  Front Commun (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-09-25

9.  Genotype-driven recruitment: a strategy whose time has come?

Authors:  Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Kaitlin J Soye; Anne Marie Tassé; Bartha Maria Knoppers; Jennifer R Harris
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 10.  The translational potential of research on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomics.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Paul Appelbaum; Lauren Dame; Patricia Marshall; Nancy Press; Reed Pyeritz; Richard Sharp; Eric Juengst
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.