Literature DB >> 24748992

Developing a Model of the Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Connie M Ulrich1, Kathleen A Knafl2, Sarah J Ratcliffe3, Therese S Richmond1, Christine Grady4, Claiborne Miller-Davis4, Gwenyth R Wallen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recruiting and retaining human participants in cancer clinical trials is challenging for many investigators. Although we expect participants to identify and weigh the benefits and burdens of research participation for themselves, it is not clear what burdens adult cancer participants perceive in relation to benefits. We identify key attributes and develop an initial conceptual framework of benefit and burden based on interviews with individuals enrolled in cancer clinical research.
METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 32 patients enrolled in cancer clinical trials at a large northeastern cancer center. Krueger's guidelines for qualitative methodology were followed.
RESULTS: Respondents reported a range of benefits and burdens associated with research participation. Benefits such as access to needed medications that subjects otherwise might not be able to afford, early detection and monitoring of the disease, potential for remission or cure, and the ability to take control of their lives through actively participating in the trial were identified. Burdens included the potentiality of side effects, worry and fear of the unknown, loss of job support, and financial concerns.
CONCLUSIONS: Both benefit and burden influence research participation, including recruitment and retention in clinical trials. Dimensions of benefit and burden include physical, psychological, economic, familial, and social. Understanding the benefit-burden balance involved in the voluntary consent of human subjects is a fundamental tenet of research and important to ensure that subjects have made an informed decision regarding their decision to participate in clinical research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benefits; burdens; cancer; clinical trials; qualitative methods

Year:  2012        PMID: 24748992      PMCID: PMC3989990          DOI: 10.1080/21507716.2011.653472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJOB Prim Res        ISSN: 2150-7724


  18 in total

1.  What makes clinical research ethical?

Authors:  E J Emanuel; D Wendler; C Grady
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000 May 24-31       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Therapeutic misconception and the appreciation of risks in clinical trials.

Authors:  Charles W Lidz; Paul S Appelbaum; Thomas Grisso; Michelle Renaud
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Respondent burden in clinical research: when are we asking too much of subjects?

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Gwenyth R Wallen; Autumn Feister; Christine Grady
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug

4.  Does it pay to pay? A randomized trial of prepaid financial incentives and lottery incentives in surveys of nonphysician healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Marion Danis; Deloris Koziol; Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer; Ryan Hubbard; Christine Grady
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Barriers to the participation of African-American patients with cancer in clinical trials: a pilot study.

Authors:  Anjali S Advani; Benjamin Atkeson; Carrie L Brown; Bercedis L Peterson; Laura Fish; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jon P Gockerman; Marc Gautier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  False hopes and best data: consent to research and the therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C W Lidz; P Benson; W Winslade
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  The therapeutic misconception: informed consent in psychiatric research.

Authors:  P S Appelbaum; L H Roth; C Lidz
Journal:  Int J Law Psychiatry       Date:  1982

8.  Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities.

Authors:  Vivek H Murthy; Harlan M Krumholz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The attitudes of 1066 patients with cancer towards participation in randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  V Jenkins; D Farewell; L Batt; T Maughan; L Branston; C Langridge; L Parlour; V Farewell; L Fallowfield
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients.

Authors:  L E Carlson; M Angen; J Cullum; E Goodey; J Koopmans; L Lamont; J H MacRae; M Martin; G Pelletier; J Robinson; J S A Simpson; M Speca; L Tillotson; B D Bultz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-14       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  20 in total

1.  Racial Differences Among Factors Associated with Participation in Clinical Research Trials.

Authors:  Anita Kurt; Lauren Semler; Jeanne L Jacoby; Melanie B Johnson; Beth A Careyva; Brian Stello; Timothy Friel; Mark C Knouse; Hope Kincaid; John C Smulian
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-09-08

2.  A New Measure of Research Participant Burden: Brief Report.

Authors:  Jennifer H Lingler; Karen L Schmidt; Amanda L Gentry; Lu Hu; Lauren A Terhorst
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Human Subjects Protection and Cancer Surveillance Research: Revised Regulations, Expanded Opportunities.

Authors:  Robert H McLaughlin; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Dennis Deapen; Marta Induni
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Reasons for and reservations about research participation in acutely injured adults.

Authors:  Elliane Irani; Therese S Richmond
Journal:  J Nurs Scholarsh       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.176

5.  Seriously Injured Urban Black Men's Perceptions of Clinical Research Participation.

Authors:  Marta M Bruce; Connie M Ulrich; Nancy Kassam-Adams; Therese S Richmond
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-12-22

6.  Cancer clinical trial participants' assessment of risk and benefit.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Gwenyth R Wallen; Qiuping Pearl Zhou; Kathleen Knafl; Christine Grady
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2015-05-01

7.  Development and Preliminary Testing of the Perceived Benefit and Burden Scales for Cancer Clinical Trial Participation.

Authors:  Connie M Ulrich; Qiuping Pearl Zhou; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Kathleen Knafl; Gwenyth R Wallen; Therese S Richmond; Christine Grady
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  "It Can Be Hard But It's Not Bad": Three Questions to Solicit Caregiver Perceptions of Benefits and Burdens to Participating in Pediatric Palliative Care Research.

Authors:  Cheryl Reggio; Catriona Mowbray; Mia K Waldron; Adelaide L Rood; Gabriella Sibilia; Kim Mooney-Doyle; Pamela S Hinds
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 2.947

9.  Perceived Benefits and Burdens of Participation for Caregivers of Cancer Patients in Hospice Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Debra Parker Oliver; Jacquelyn J Benson; Connie Ulrich; Karla T Washington; Abigail J Rolbiecki; Patrick White; Jamie B Smith; Christina Lero; Olivia J Landon; George Demiris
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 5.576

10.  Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Houghton; Maura Dowling; Pauline Meskell; Andrew Hunter; Heidi Gardner; Aislinn Conway; Shaun Treweek; Katy Sutcliffe; Jane Noyes; Declan Devane; Jane R Nicholas; Linda M Biesty
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.