Literature DB >> 17846439

Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women.

Ann Cranney1, Sophie A Jamal, James F Tsang, Robert G Josse, William D Leslie.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study objectives were to determine fracture rates in relation to bone mineral density at various central skeletal sites, using the World Health Organization definition for osteoporosis (T-score -2.5 or less), and to contrast fracture patterns among women 50 to 64 years of age with those among women 65 years of age and older.
METHODS: Historical cohort study with a mean observation period of 3.2 (standard deviation [SD] 1.5) years. The study group (16,505 women 50 years of age or older) was drawn from the Manitoba Bone Density Program database, which includes all bone mineral density results for Manitoba. Baseline density measurements for the lumbar spine and hip were performed with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Outcomes included the percentage of osteoporotic fractures and the rates of fracture and excess fracture (per 1000 person-years) among postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis relative to those with normal bone mineral density (according to the classification of the World Health Organization).
RESULTS: The mean age was 65 (SD 9) years, and the mean T-scores for all sites fell within the osteopenic category. There were 765 incident fractures (fracture rate 14.5 [95% confidence interval, CI, 13.5-15.6 [per 1000 person-years). Fracture rates were significantly higher among women 65 years of age or older than among women 50-64 years of age (21.6 [95% CI 19.7-23.4] v. 8.6 [95% CI 7.5-9.7] per 1000 person-years, p < 0.001). Although fracture rates were significantly higher among women with osteoporotic T-scores, most fractures occurred in women with nonosteoporotic values (min-max: 59.7%-67.8%).
INTERPRETATION: In this study, most of the postmenopausal women with osteoporotic fractures had nonosteoporotic bone mineral density values. This finding highlights the importance of considering key clinical risk factors that operate independently of bone mineral density (such as age) when assessing fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846439      PMCID: PMC1963365          DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.070234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  24 in total

1.  The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50-99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA).

Authors:  E S Siris; S K Brenneman; E Barrett-Connor; P D Miller; S Sajjan; M L Berger; Y-T Chen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; Gary M Kiebzak; E Michael Lewiecki; Diane Krueger; Ronald E Gangnon; Paul D Miller; John A Shepherd; Marc K Drezner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada.

Authors:  Kerry Siminoski; William D Leslie; Heather Frame; Anthony Hodsman; Robert G Josse; Aliya Khan; Brian C Lentle; Jacques Lévesque; David J Lyons; Giuseppe Tarulli; Jacques P Brown
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.248

5.  Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Brian C Lentle; Jacques P Brown; Aliya Khan; William D Leslie; Jacques Levesque; David J Lyons; Kerry Siminoski; Giuseppe Tarulli; Robert G Josse; Anthony Hodsman
Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.248

6.  Effectiveness of bone density measurement for predicting osteoporotic fractures in clinical practice.

Authors:  William D Leslie; James F Tsang; Patricia A Caetano; Lisa M Lix
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 5.958

7.  Identification of osteopenic women at high risk of fracture: the OFELY study.

Authors:  Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Françoise Munoz; Patrick Garnero; François Duboeuf; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2005-06-20       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  The impact of the use of multiple risk indicators for fracture on case-finding strategies: a mathematical approach.

Authors:  Chris De Laet; Anders Odén; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jönsson; John A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 9.  Guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: T-scores vs fractures.

Authors:  Paul D Miller
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.306

10.  Construction and validation of a population-based bone densitometry database.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Patricia A Caetano; Leonard R Macwilliam; Gregory S Finlayson
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  97 in total

1.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Fracture predictive ability of physical performance tests and history of falls in elderly women: a 10-year prospective study.

Authors:  A Wihlborg; M Englund; K Åkesson; P Gerdhem
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  A comparative study of using non-hip bone density inputs with FRAX®.

Authors:  W D Leslie; L M Lix; H Johansson; A Oden; E McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Diabetes and osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Luca Mascitelli; Francesca Pezzetta
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Absolute fracture risk reporting in clinical practice: a physician-centered survey.

Authors:  W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Comparison of Methods for Improving Fracture Risk Assessment in Diabetes: The Manitoba BMD Registry.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Helena Johansson; Eugene V McCloskey; Nicholas C Harvey; John A Kanis; Didier Hans
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Association of estrogen receptor β and estrogen-related receptor α gene polymorphisms with bone mineral density in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Amira Shoukry; Sally M Shalaby; Rasha L Etewa; Hanan S Ahmed; Hossam M Abdelrahman
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  Risk-equivalent T-score adjustment for using lumbar spine trabecular bone score (TBS): the Manitoba BMD registry.

Authors:  W D Leslie; E Shevroja; H Johansson; E V McCloskey; N C Harvey; J A Kanis; D Hans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Effects of bone remodeling agents following teriparatide treatment.

Authors:  D Burkard; T Beckett; E Kourtjian; C Messingschlager; R Sipahi; M Padley; J Stubbart
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility.

Authors:  Hélder Fonseca; Daniel Moreira-Gonçalves; Hans-Joachim Appell Coriolano; José Alberto Duarte
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.