Literature DB >> 17186388

Guidelines for the diagnosis of osteoporosis: T-scores vs fractures.

Paul D Miller1.   

Abstract

The development of bone mineral densitimometry methodologies, especially central dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) methods have allowed this quantitative tool to be used to diagnose osteoporosis before the first fragility fracture has occurred. The World Health Organization osteoporosis working group set the stage for the BMD cut-off criteria development. The wide application of DXA has brought the treatment of osteoporosis to the primary care level, a very necessary step if this increasingly prevalent disease is to have a decline in its incidence. The most difficult osteoporosis cases, for which there are many and their associated difficult DXA results and interpretation will always require specialists' involvement. In particular, the embracement of the WHO absolute fracture risk validated project will take DXA to a much greater level of value in making management decisions. In particular, the WHO absolute risk data will allow physicians, health-economic policy makers, and payors of medical services to come closer together to decide which patients are at a level of unacceptable fracture risk that justifies treatment intervention. The implementation of this validated project will also remove the unacceptable subjective computer printouts on DXA reports that often lead to the over-treatment of low risk patients and at times the under-treatment of high risk patients. The evolution of the clinical interpretation of bone densitometry has been a work in progress. Challenges in the clinical measurement of bone strength remain and will also evolve. The field of osteoporosis has grown with the use of DXA and will continue to embrace this technology as other technologies to measure fracture risk become applied in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17186388     DOI: 10.1007/s11154-006-9006-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord        ISSN: 1389-9155            Impact factor:   9.306


  88 in total

1.  Clinical performance of a highly portable, scanning calcaneal ultrasonometer.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; S Cheng; P D Miller; E S Orwoll
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and Executive Summary of the 2005 Position Development Conference.

Authors:  Neil Binkley; John P Bilezikian; David L Kendler; Edward S Leib; E Michael Lewiecki; Steven M Petak
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-05-12       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 3.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Frederik Borgstrom; Chris De Laet; Helena Johansson; Olof Johnell; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Niklas Zethraeus; Bruce Pfleger; Nikolai Khaltaev
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-23       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Association between self-reported prior wrist fractures and risk of subsequent hip and radiographic vertebral fractures in older women: a prospective study.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Howard A Fink; Brent C Taylor; Katie L Stone; Teresa A Hillier; Michael C Nevitt; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-10-25       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis: guidelines for the utilization of bone densitometry.

Authors:  D T Baran; K G Faulkner; H K Genant; P D Miller; R Pacifici
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 6.  Anti-vertebral fracture efficacy of raloxifene: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ego Seeman; Gerald G Crans; Adolfo Diez-Perez; Karen V Pinette; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  An approach to identifying osteopenic women at increased short-term risk of fracture.

Authors:  Paul D Miller; Suna Barlas; Susan K Brenneman; Thomas A Abbott; Ya-Ting Chen; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

Review 10.  The epidemiology of vertebral fractures. European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study Group.

Authors:  C Cooper; T O'Neill; A Silman
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  The role of FSH and TSH in bone loss and its clinical relevance.

Authors:  Manasi Agrawal; Guangyu Zhu; Li Sun; Mone Zaidi; Jameel Iqbal
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 2.  Bone loss or lost bone: rationale and recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of early postmenopausal bone loss.

Authors:  Mone Zaidi; Charles H Turner; Ernesto Canalis; Roberto Pacifici; Li Sun; Jameel Iqbal; X Edward Guo; Stuart Silverman; Solomon Epstein; Clifford J Rosen
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Preparing for and managing a pregnancy after bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Michelle A Kominiarek
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.300

4.  Quantitative ultrasound and radiographic absorptiometry are associated with vertebral deformity in Japanese Women: the Hizen-Oshima study.

Authors:  Y Abe; N Takamura; Z Ye; M Tomita; M Osaki; Y Kusano; T Nakamura; K Aoyagi; S Honda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Hydrogeochemistry of the drinking water sources of Derebogazi Village (Kahramanmaras) and their effects on human health.

Authors:  Yusuf Uras; Yagmur Uysal; Tugba Atilan Arikan; Alican Kop; Mustafa Caliskan
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.609

6.  Prevalence of vertebral fracture in elderly men and women with osteopenia.

Authors:  Christian Muschitz; Janina Patsch; Elisabeth Buchinger; Elise Edlmayr; Günther Nirnberger; Vasilis Evdokimidis; Reinhart Waneck; Peter Pietschmann; Heinrich Resch
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

7.  Correlation between bone mineral density and serum trace element contents of elderly males in Beijing urban area.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Haotian Yu; Guohua Yang; Yan Zhang; Wenjiao Wang; Tianjiao Su; Weifeng Ma; Fan Yang; Liying Chen; Li He; Yuanzheng Ma; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-10-15

8.  Relationships between endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms and osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Shun-zhi Liu; Hong Yan; Wei-kun Hou; Peng Xu; Juan Tian; Li-fang Tian; Bo-feng Zhu; Jie Ma; She-min Lu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Decreased bone mineral density in adult familial Mediterranean fever patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  Elif Suyani; Mehmet Akif Ozturk; Serpil Muge Deger; Mehmet D Demirag; Berna Goker; Seminur Haznedaroglu
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 2.980

10.  Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Ann Cranney; Sophie A Jamal; James F Tsang; Robert G Josse; William D Leslie
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.