Literature DB >> 16392027

The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50-99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA).

E S Siris1, S K Brenneman, E Barrett-Connor, P D Miller, S Sajjan, M L Berger, Y-T Chen.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluates the effect of age and bone mineral density (BMD) on the absolute, excess, and relative risk for osteoporotic fractures at the hip, wrist, forearm, spine, and rib within 3 years of peripheral BMD testing in postmenopausal women over a wide range of postmenopausal ages.
METHODS: Data were obtained from 170,083 women, aged 50-99 years, enrolled in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) following recruitment from their primary care physicians' offices across the United States. Risk factors for fracture and peripheral BMD T-scores at the heel, forearm, or finger were obtained at baseline. Self-reported new fractures at the hip, spine, rib, wrist, and forearm were obtained from questionnaires at 1- and 3-year follow-ups. Absolute, excess (attributable to low BMD), and unadjusted and adjusted relative risks of fracture were calculated.
RESULTS: At follow-up, 5312 women reported 5676 fractures (868 hip, 2420 wrist/forearm, 1531 rib, and 857 spine). Absolute risk of fracture increased with age for all fracture sites. This age-effect was most evident for hip fracture--both the incidence and the excess risk of hip fracture for women with low BMD increased at least twofold for each decade increase in age. The relative risk for any fracture per 1 SD decrease in BMD was similar across age groups (p>0.07). Women with low BMD (T-score <-1.0) had a similar relative risk for fracture regardless of age.
CONCLUSIONS: At any given BMD, not only the absolute fracture risk but also the excess fracture risk increased with advancing age. Relative risk of fracture for low bone mass was consistent across all age groups from 50 to 99 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16392027     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0027-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  48 in total

Review 1.  Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effectiveness analysis. Introduction.

Authors: 
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  The effects of standardization and reference values on patient classification for spine and femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  A Simmons; D E Simpson; M J O'Doherty; S Barrington; A J Coakley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Prevention of osteoporotic hip fracture: global versus high-risk strategies.

Authors:  E Barrett-Connor; R Gore; W S Browner; S R Cummings
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis.

Authors:  Stacey A Wainwright; Lynn M Marshall; Kristine E Ensrud; Jane A Cauley; Dennis M Black; Teresa A Hillier; Marc C Hochberg; Molly T Vogt; Eric S Orwoll
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Validity of self-reports of fractures in perimenopausal women.

Authors:  K Honkanen; R Honkanen; L Heikkinen; H Kröger; S Saarikoski
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Bone mass measurements and risk of fracture in Caucasian women: a review of findings from prospective studies.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D Black
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1995-02-27       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  A model of lifetime osteoporosis impact.

Authors:  E A Chrischilles; C D Butler; C S Davis; R B Wallace
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-10

Review 8.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  John A Kanis
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Authors:  Ethel S Siris; Ya-Ting Chen; Thomas A Abbott; Elizabeth Barrett-Connor; Paul D Miller; Lois E Wehren; Marc L Berger
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-24

10.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  77 in total

Review 1.  Depression and osteoporosis: a research synthesis with meta-analysis.

Authors:  G Cizza; S Primma; M Coyle; L Gourgiotis; G Csako
Journal:  Horm Metab Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.936

2.  Predicting trabecular bone elastic properties from measures of bone volume fraction and fabric on the basis of micromagnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Michael J Wald; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; Yusuf A Bhagat; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  The use of computed tomography attenuation to evaluate osteoporosis following acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar vertebra.

Authors:  Osa Emohare; Amanda Cagan; Robert Morgan; Rick Davis; Martin Asis; Julie Switzer; David W Polly
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-06

4.  Age trends in proximal femur geometry in men: variation by race and ethnicity.

Authors:  T G Travison; T J Beck; G R Esche; A B Araujo; J B McKinlay
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-11-24       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Progressive load training for the quadriceps muscle associated with proprioception exercises for the prevention of falls in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  L E P P Teixeira; K N G Silva; A M Imoto; T J P Teixeira; A H Kayo; R Montenegro-Rodrigues; M S Peccin; V F M Trevisani
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; B Dustin Pooler; Travis Lauder; Alejandro Muñoz del Rio; Richard J Bruce; Neil Binkley
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  New perspectives on the definition and the management of severe osteoporosis: the patient with two or more fragility fractures.

Authors:  R Nuti; M L Brandi; G Isaia; U Tarantino; S Silvestri; S Adami
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.256

Review 8.  The role of bone biopsy in patients with chronic renal failure.

Authors:  Paul D Miller
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Undertreatment of osteoporosis in the oldest old? A nationwide study of over 700,000 older people.

Authors:  Kristina Johnell; Johan Fastbom
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  Assessment of fracture risk in women with breast cancer using current vs emerging guidelines.

Authors:  P Hadji; M Ziller; U S Albert; M Kalder
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.