Literature DB >> 17846188

Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma.

T H Mulkens1, P Marchal, S Daineffe, R Salgado, P Bellinck, B te Rijdt, B Kegelaers, J-L Termote.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to evaluate the possible use of low-dose multidetector CT (MDCT) in cervical clearance of patients with blunt trauma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 191 patients underwent cervical spine MDCT with 6- and 16-MDCT: standard-dose (n = 51) and low-dose MDCT with tube current modulation at high (n = 70) and low (n = 70) tube voltage (kilovolts). Effective dose, image noise, and subjective image quality were calculated in all of the patients.
RESULTS: MDCT found 18 patients (9.4%) with a cervical spine fracture, 3 in the standard-dose and 15 in the low-dose group, 14 of them with unstable lesions. Tube current modulation reduced the dose by 50%-61% in all of the low-dose examinations. The mean effective dose was 3.75, 1.57, and 1.08 mSv, and mean image noise was 14.82, 17.46, and 19.72 Hounsfield units for standard dose and low dose with high and low kilovolt examinations, respectively. These differences in mean effective dose and image noise were significant between the 3 examination groups (Kruskal-Wallis test: P < .0001 and P = .0001). Evaluation of subjective image quality by 2 radiologists and 2 residents showed no significant difference in image quality score among the 3 examination groups (Kruskal-Wallis tests, P = .61, .32, .18, and .31). All of the reviewers correctly detected 18 fractures, except 1 resident, who missed 3 fractures.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose cervical spine MDCT in patients with blunt trauma gives a substantial dose reduction of 61%-71%, compared with standard-dose MDCT, with a small increase in image noise and without difference in subjective image quality evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17846188      PMCID: PMC8134402          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  27 in total

1.  Validity of a set of clinical criteria to rule out injury to the cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma. National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Group.

Authors:  J R Hoffman; W R Mower; A B Wolfson; K H Todd; M I Zucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-07-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Imaging of acute cervical spine injuries: review and outlook.

Authors:  B J Tins; V N Cassar-Pullicino
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Exclusion of unstable cervical spine injury in obtunded patients with blunt trauma: is MR imaging needed when multi-detector row CT findings are normal?

Authors:  Gerard J Hogan; Stuart E Mirvis; Kathirkamanathan Shanmuganathan; Thomas M Scalea
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Cervical spine clearance in blunt trauma: evaluation of a computed tomography-based protocol.

Authors:  Barry Sanchez; Kenneth Waxman; Thomas Jones; Scott Conner; Richard Chung; Salvador Becerra
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-07

5.  Helical computed tomographic scanning for the evaluation of the cervical spine in the unconscious, intubated trauma patient.

Authors:  Karim Brohi; Marie Healy; Tim Fotheringham; Otto Chan; Chris Aylwin; Siobhan Whitley; Michael Walsh
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-05

6.  Role of clinical examination in screening for blunt cervical spine injury.

Authors:  R P Gonzalez; P O Fried; M Bukhalo; M R Holevar; M E Falimirski
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.113

7.  A PC program for estimating organ dose and effective dose values in computed tomography.

Authors:  W A Kalender; B Schmidt; M Zankl; M Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  The inefficiency of plain radiography to evaluate the cervical spine after blunt trauma.

Authors:  Stephen C Gale; Vicente H Gracias; Patrick M Reilly; C William Schwab
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2005-11

9.  Value of multiplanar reformations (MPR) in multidetector CT (MDCT) of acute vertebral fractures: do we still have to read the transverse images?

Authors:  Philipp G C Begemann; Jörn Kemper; Christian Gatzka; Alexander Stork; Claus Nolte-Ernsting; Gerhard Adam
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Practice management guidelines for trauma from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma.

Authors:  M Pasquale; T C Fabian
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1998-06
View more
  25 in total

1.  Low kilovoltage CT of the neck with 70 kVp: comparison with a standard protocol.

Authors:  R Gnannt; A Winklehner; R Goetti; B Schmidt; S Kollias; H Alkadhi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Whole body imaging in the diagnosis of blunt trauma, ionizing radiation hazards and residual risk.

Authors:  J P Kepros; R C Opreanu; R Samaraweera; A Briningstool; C A Morrison; B D Mosher; P Schneider; P Stevens
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  Diagnostic CT radiation and cancer induction.

Authors:  Paula J Richards; Jennifer George
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Radiation dose reduction in multidetector CT in fracture evaluation.

Authors:  Jung Woo Yi; Hee Jin Park; So Yeon Lee; Myung Ho Rho; Hyun Pyo Hong; Yoon Jung Choi; Mi Sung Kim
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Pitfalls in multidetector computed tomography imaging of traumatic spinal injuries.

Authors:  Jenn Nee Khoo; Le Roy Chong; Elizabeth Hui-Ying Chan; Angeline Choo-Choo Poh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2011-07-06

6.  Computed tomography of the cervical spine: comparison of image quality between a standard-dose and a low-dose protocol using filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Fabio Becce; Yosr Ben Salah; Francis R Verdun; Bruno C Vande Berg; Frederic E Lecouvet; Reto Meuli; Patrick Omoumi
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Raise the bar and lower the dose: current and future strategies for radiation dose reduction in head and neck imaging.

Authors:  M Ibrahim; H Parmar; E Christodoulou; S Mukherji
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  MDCT-based Finite Element Analysis of Vertebral Fracture Risk: What Dose is Needed?

Authors:  D Anitha; Kai Mei; Michael Dieckmeyer; Felix K Kopp; Nico Sollmann; Claus Zimmer; Jan S Kirschke; Peter B Noel; Thomas Baum; Karupppasamy Subburaj
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Evaluation of ultra-low dose CT in the diagnosis of pediatric-like fractures using an experimental animal study.

Authors:  Joerg D Moritz; Beata Hoffmann; Dirk Sehr; Katrin Keil; Juliane Eggerking; Godo Groth; Amke Caliebe; Jens Dischinger; Martin Heller; Hendrik Bolte
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Comparison of conventional radiography and MDCT in suspected scaphoid fractures.

Authors:  Cyrus Behzadi; Murat Karul; Frank Oliver Henes; Azien Laqmani; Philipp Catala-Lehnen; Wolfgang Lehmann; Hans-Dieter Nagel; Gerhard Adam; Marc Regier
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.