Literature DB >> 10437836

Role of clinical examination in screening for blunt cervical spine injury.

R P Gonzalez1, P O Fried, M Bukhalo, M R Holevar, M E Falimirski.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the hypothesis that awake and alert blunt trauma patients with Glasgow Coma Scores of 14 or 15 (regardless of blood ethanol level or other injuries sustained) can be effectively evaluated with clinical examination without radiographic evaluation of the cervical spine. STUDY
DESIGN: During a 32-month period at an urban Level 1 Trauma Center, 2,176 consecutive blunt trauma patients who presented with Glasgow Coma Scores of 14 or 15 were prospectively evaluated by trauma resident housestaff. Housestaff performed physical examinations of the neck and questioned the patients for the presence of neck pain. Following study form documentation of the cervical neck examination, a lateral cervical spine x-ray was performed. Further studies such as swimmer's view and CAT scan were performed if the lateral x-ray could not completely evaluate C1 to C7. These further studies were considered part of the lateral cervical spine (c-spine) x-ray screen. Attending radiologists performed final x-ray interpretations.
RESULTS: The study consisted of 2,176 patients, 33 (1.6%) of whom were diagnosed with cervical spine injury. Of the 33 patients with cervical spine injury, 3 had negative clinical examinations (sensitivity, 91%). Lateral c-spine x-ray screen was negative in 1 of these 3 patients. The 2 patients with negative c-spine clinical examination but positive lateral c-spine x-ray screens were diagnosed with C2 spinous process fracture and C6-C7 body fractures. Thirteen patients with negative lateral c-spine screens (sensitivity, 61%) were diagnosed with cervical spine injury. We evaluated 463 patients with blood ethanol levels greater than 100 mg/dL, and 6 (1.3%) were diagnosed with c-spine injury. No injuries were missed on clinical examination in this subgroup with elevated blood ethanol levels.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) Clinical examination of the neck can reliably rule out significant cervical spine injury in the awake and alert blunt trauma patient. Addition of lateral c-spine x-ray does not improve the sensitivity of clinical examination in the diagnosis of significant cervical spine injury. 2) Elevated ethanol level is not a contraindication to the use of clinical examination as the screening tool for cervical spine injury. Level of consciousness, as determined by Glasgow Coma Score, is a more effective criterion to dictate a screening method for cervical spine injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10437836     DOI: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00065-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  12 in total

Review 1.  [Shock trauma room management of spinal injuries in the framework of multiple trauma. A systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  A Woltmann; V Bühren
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Evidence based diagnostic procedures for the determination of suspected blunt cervical spine injuries. Development of an algorithm].

Authors:  B A Leidel; K-G Kanz; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Evaluation of distracting pain and clinical judgment in cervical spine clearance of trauma patients.

Authors:  Eric Kamenetsky; Thomas J Esposito; Carol R Schermer
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Validity and reliability of clinical prediction rules used to screen for cervical spine injury in alert low-risk patients with blunt trauma to the neck: part 2. A systematic review from the Cervical Assessment and Diagnosis Research Evaluation (CADRE) Collaboration.

Authors:  N Moser; N Lemeunier; D Southerst; H Shearer; K Murnaghan; D Sutton; P Côté
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Spinal cord injury resulting from injury missed on CT scan: the danger of relying on CT alone for collar removal.

Authors:  Gregory Gebauer; Meredith Osterman; James Harrop; Alexander Vaccaro
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Distracting injury defined: does an isolated hip fracture constitute a distracting injury for clearance of the cervical spine?

Authors:  Ryan Lindborg; Amani Jambhekar; Vincent Chan; Daniel Laskey; James Rucinski; Bashar Fahoum
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-09-21

Review 7.  Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in pediatric trauma patients.

Authors:  Annelie Slaar; M M Fockens; Junfeng Wang; Mario Maas; David J Wilson; J Carel Goslings; Niels Wl Schep; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-12-07

8.  C Spine Fracture on OPG.

Authors:  Kedarnath N S; Mamatha N S; Shruthi R
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2013-08-01

9.  Comparison of low-dose with standard-dose multidetector CT in cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  T H Mulkens; P Marchal; S Daineffe; R Salgado; P Bellinck; B te Rijdt; B Kegelaers; J-L Termote
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Misdiagnosed bilateral C5-C6 dislocation causing cervical spine instability: a case report.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gelalis; Georgios Christoforou; Christina M Arnaoutoglou; Angelos N Politis; Gregory Manoudis; Theodoros A Xenakis
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.