Literature DB >> 22592417

Sequential assessment of prey through the use of multiple sensory cues by an eavesdropping bat.

Rachel A Page1, Tanja Schnelle, Elisabeth K V Kalko, Thomas Bunge, Ximena E Bernal.   

Abstract

Predators are often confronted with a broad diversity of potential prey. They rely on cues associated with prey quality and palatability to optimize their hunting success and to avoid consuming toxic prey. Here, we investigate a predator's ability to assess prey cues during capture, handling, and consumption when confronted with conflicting information about prey quality. We used advertisement calls of a preferred prey item (the túngara frog) to attract fringe-lipped bats, Trachops cirrhosus, then offered palatable, poisonous, and chemically manipulated anurans as prey. Advertisement calls elicited an attack response, but as bats approached, they used additional sensory cues in a sequential manner to update their information about prey size and palatability. While both palatable and poisonous small anurans were readily captured, large poisonous toads were approached but not contacted suggesting the use of echolocation for assessment of prey size at close range. Once prey was captured, bats used chemical cues to make final, post-capture decisions about whether to consume the prey. Bats dropped small, poisonous toads as well as palatable frogs coated in toad toxins either immediately or shortly after capture. Our study suggests that echolocation and chemical cues obtained at close range supplement information obtained from acoustic cues at long range. Updating information about prey quality minimizes the occurrence of costly errors and may be advantageous in tracking temporal and spatial fluctuations of prey and exploiting novel food sources. These findings emphasize the sequential, complex nature of prey assessment that may allow exploratory and flexible hunting behaviors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22592417     DOI: 10.1007/s00114-012-0920-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Naturwissenschaften        ISSN: 0028-1042


  13 in total

1.  Ultraviolet vision in a bat.

Authors:  York Winter; Jorge López; Otto Von Helversen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-10-09       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Flexibility in assessment of prey cues: frog-eating bats and frog calls.

Authors:  Rachel A Page; Michael J Ryan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  The adaptive function of tiger moth clicks against echolocating bats: an experimental and synthetic approach.

Authors:  John M Ratcliffe; James H Fullard
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Acoustic mimicry in a predator-prey interaction.

Authors:  Jesse R Barber; William E Conner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Bat predation and the evolution of frog vocalizations in the neotropics.

Authors:  M D Tuttle; M J Ryan
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Histological convergent evolution of the accessory submandibular glands in four species of frog-eating bats.

Authors:  B Tandler; C J Phillips; T Nagato
Journal:  Eur J Morphol       Date:  1996-08

Review 7.  Pharmacology and toxicology of toad venom.

Authors:  K K Chen; A Kovaríková
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Sound strategy: acoustic aposematism in the bat-tiger moth arms race.

Authors:  Nickolay I Hristov; William E Conner
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-03-17

9.  Spatial and temporal patterns of alkaloid variation in the poison frog Oophaga pumilio in Costa Rica and Panama over 30 years.

Authors:  Ralph A Saporito; Maureen A Donnelly; Poonam Jain; H Martin Garraffo; Thomas F Spande; John W Daly
Journal:  Toxicon       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.033

10.  Finding food: senses involved in foraging for insect larvae in the electric fish gnathonemus petersii

Authors: 
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  Breaking the cipher: ant eavesdropping on the variational trail pheromone of its termite prey.

Authors:  Xiao-Lan Wen; Ping Wen; Cecilia A L Dahlsjö; David Sillam-Dussès; Jan Šobotník
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Multimodal cues improve prey localization under complex environmental conditions.

Authors:  F Rhebergen; R C Taylor; M J Ryan; R A Page; W Halfwerk
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Echolocation intensity and directionality of perching and flying fringe-lipped bats, Trachops cirrhosus (Phyllostomidae).

Authors:  Annemarie Surlykke; Lasse Jakobsen; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Rachel A Page
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

4.  Unusual echolocation behaviour of the common sword-nosed bat Lonchorhina aurita: an adaptation to aerial insectivory in a phyllostomid bat?

Authors:  Gloria Gessinger; Tania P Gonzalez-Terrazas; Rachel A Page; Kirsten Jung; Marco Tschapka
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Multisensory integration and behavioral plasticity in sharks from different ecological niches.

Authors:  Jayne M Gardiner; Jelle Atema; Robert E Hueter; Philip J Motta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.