Literature DB >> 11784743

Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.

S J D Prince1, B G Cumming, A J Parker.   

Abstract

The responses of single cortical neurons were measured as a function of the binocular disparity of dynamic random dot stereograms for a large sample of neurons (n = 787) from V1 of the awake macaque. From this sample, we selected 180 neurons whose tuning curves were strongly tuned for disparity, well sampled and well described by one-dimensional Gabor functions. The fitted parameters of the Gabor functions were used to resolve three outstanding issues in binocular stereopsis. First, we considered whether tuning curves can be meaningfully divided into discrete tuning types. Careful examination of the distributions of the Gabor parameters that determine tuning shape revealed no evidence for clustering. We conclude that a continuum of tuning types is present. Second, we investigated the mechanism of disparity encoding for V1 neurons. The shape of the disparity tuning function can be used to distinguish between position-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by an interocular shift in receptive field position) and phase-encoding (in which disparity is encoded by a difference in the receptive field profile in the 2 eyes). Both position and phase encoding were found to be common. This was confirmed by an independent assessment of disparity encoding based on the measurement of disparity sensitivity for sinusoidal luminance gratings of different spatial frequencies. The contributions of phase and position to disparity encoding were compared by estimating a population average of the rate of change in firing rate per degree of disparity. When this was calculated separately for the phase and position contributions, they were found to be closely similar. Third, we investigated the range of disparity tuning in V1 as a function of eccentricity in the parafoveal range. We find few cells which are selective for disparities greater than +/-1 degrees even at the largest eccentricity of approximately 5 degrees. The preferred disparity was correlated with the spatial scale of the tuning curve, and for most units lay within a +/-pi radians phase limit. Such a size-disparity correlation is potentially useful for the solution of the correspondence problem.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11784743     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00466.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  70 in total

1.  Measuring V1 receptive fields despite eye movements in awake monkeys.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Contribution of middle temporal area to coarse depth discrimination: comparison of neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity.

Authors:  Takanori Uka; Gregory C DeAngelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Ocular dominance predicts neither strength nor class of disparity selectivity with random-dot stimuli in primate V1.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Testing quantitative models of binocular disparity selectivity in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Jenny C A Read; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The stimulus integration area for horizontal vergence.

Authors:  Robert S Allison; Ian P Howard; Xueping Fang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Early computational processing in binocular vision and depth perception.

Authors:  Jenny Read
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Relative luminance and binocular disparity preferences are correlated in macaque primary visual cortex, matching natural scene statistics.

Authors:  Jason M Samonds; Brian R Potetz; Tai Sing Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Bridging the gap: global disparity processing in the human visual cortex.

Authors:  Benoit R Cottereau; Suzanne P McKee; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Stereoacuity in the periphery is limited by internal noise.

Authors:  Susan G Wardle; Peter J Bex; John Cass; David Alais
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Neural modulation by binocular disparity greatest in human dorsal visual stream.

Authors:  Loredana Minini; Andrew J Parker; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.