OBJECTIVE: To measure change in adult non-smokers' exposure to secondhand smoke in public and private places after smoke-free legislation was implemented in Scotland. DESIGN: Repeat cross sectional survey. SETTING: Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Scottish adults, aged 18 to 74 years, recruited and interviewed in their homes. INTERVENTION: Comprehensive smoke-free legislation that prohibits smoking in virtually all enclosed public places and workplaces, including bars, restaurants, and cafes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Salivary cotinine, self reported exposure to smoke in public and private places, and self reported smoking restriction in homes and in cars. RESULTS: Overall, geometric mean cotinine concentrations in adult non-smokers fell by 39% (95% confidence interval 29% to 47%), from 0.43 ng/ml at baseline to 0.26 ng/ml after legislation (P<0.001). In non-smokers from non-smoking households, geometric mean cotinine concentrations fell by 49% (40% to 56%), from 0.35 ng/ml to 0.18 ng/ml (P<0.001). The 16% fall in cotinine concentrations in non-smokers from smoking households was not statistically significant. Reduction in exposure to secondhand smoke was associated with a reduction after legislation in reported exposure to secondhand smoke in public places (pubs, other workplaces, and public transport) but not in homes and cars. We found no evidence of displacement of smoking from public places into the home. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of Scotland's smoke-free legislation has been accompanied within one year by a large reduction in exposure to secondhand smoke, which has been greatest in non-smokers living in non-smoking households. Non-smokers living in smoking households continue to have high levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.
OBJECTIVE: To measure change in adult non-smokers' exposure to secondhand smoke in public and private places after smoke-free legislation was implemented in Scotland. DESIGN: Repeat cross sectional survey. SETTING: Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: Scottish adults, aged 18 to 74 years, recruited and interviewed in their homes. INTERVENTION: Comprehensive smoke-free legislation that prohibits smoking in virtually all enclosed public places and workplaces, including bars, restaurants, and cafes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Salivary cotinine, self reported exposure to smoke in public and private places, and self reported smoking restriction in homes and in cars. RESULTS: Overall, geometric mean cotinine concentrations in adult non-smokers fell by 39% (95% confidence interval 29% to 47%), from 0.43 ng/ml at baseline to 0.26 ng/ml after legislation (P<0.001). In non-smokers from non-smoking households, geometric mean cotinine concentrations fell by 49% (40% to 56%), from 0.35 ng/ml to 0.18 ng/ml (P<0.001). The 16% fall in cotinine concentrations in non-smokers from smoking households was not statistically significant. Reduction in exposure to secondhand smoke was associated with a reduction after legislation in reported exposure to secondhand smoke in public places (pubs, other workplaces, and public transport) but not in homes and cars. We found no evidence of displacement of smoking from public places into the home. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of Scotland's smoke-free legislation has been accompanied within one year by a large reduction in exposure to secondhand smoke, which has been greatest in non-smokers living in non-smoking households. Non-smokers living in smoking households continue to have high levels of exposure to secondhand smoke.
Authors: Paul Brennan; Patricia A Buffler; Peggy Reynolds; Anna H Wu; H Erich Wichmann; Antonio Agudo; Göran Pershagen; Karl-Heinz Jöckel; Simone Benhamou; Raymond S Greenberg; Franco Merletti; Carlos Winck; Elizabeth T H Fontham; Michaela Kreuzer; Sarah C Darby; Francesco Forastiere; Lorenzo Simonato; Paolo Boffetta Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Peter H Whincup; Julie A Gilg; Jonathan R Emberson; Martin J Jarvis; Colin Feyerabend; Andrew Bryant; Mary Walker; Derek G Cook Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-06-30
Authors: C A Pope; D J Eatough; D R Gold; Y Pang; K R Nielsen; P Nath; R L Verrier; R E Kanner Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: James F Thrasher; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; Kamala Swayampakala; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Matteo Bottai Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Luke J Peppone; Mary E Reid; Kirsten B Moysich; Gary R Morrow; Pascal Jean-Pierre; Supriya G Mohile; Tom V Darling; Andrew Hyland Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-04-08 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: S Semple; C Garden; M Coggins; K S Galea; P Whelan; H Cowie; A Sánchez-Jiménez; P S Thorne; J F Hurley; J G Ayres Journal: Indoor Air Date: 2011-11-09 Impact factor: 5.770
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Louise M Hassan; Cheryl Higbee; Christian Boudreau; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Mi Yan; Mary E Thompson; Gerard Hastings Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 3.367