OBJECTIVES: We assessed attitudes and beliefs about smoke-free laws, compliance, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico City. METHODS: Trends and odds of change in attitudes and beliefs were analyzed across 3 representative surveys of Mexico City inhabitants: before implementation of the policy (n=800), 4 months after implementation (n=961), and 8 months after implementation (n=761). RESULTS: Results indicated high and increasing support for 100% smoke-free policies, although support did not increase for smoke-free bars. Agreement that such policies improved health and reinforced rights was high before policy implementation and increased thereafter. Social unacceptability of smoking increased substantially, although 25% of nonsmokers and 50% of smokers agreed with smokers' rights to smoke in public places at the final survey wave. Secondhand smoke exposure declined generally as well as in venues covered by the law, although compliance was incomplete, especially in bars. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Mexico City has been relatively successful, with changes in perceptions and behavior consistent with those revealed by studies conducted in high-income countries. Normative changes may prime populations for additional tobacco control interventions.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed attitudes and beliefs about smoke-free laws, compliance, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico City. METHODS: Trends and odds of change in attitudes and beliefs were analyzed across 3 representative surveys of Mexico City inhabitants: before implementation of the policy (n=800), 4 months after implementation (n=961), and 8 months after implementation (n=761). RESULTS: Results indicated high and increasing support for 100% smoke-free policies, although support did not increase for smoke-free bars. Agreement that such policies improved health and reinforced rights was high before policy implementation and increased thereafter. Social unacceptability of smoking increased substantially, although 25% of nonsmokers and 50% of smokers agreed with smokers' rights to smoke in public places at the final survey wave. Secondhand smoke exposure declined generally as well as in venues covered by the law, although compliance was incomplete, especially in bars. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Mexico City has been relatively successful, with changes in perceptions and behavior consistent with those revealed by studies conducted in high-income countries. Normative changes may prime populations for additional tobacco control interventions.
Authors: Andrew Hyland; Louise M Hassan; Cheryl Higbee; Christian Boudreau; Geoffrey T Fong; Ron Borland; K Michael Cummings; Mi Yan; Mary E Thompson; Gerard Hastings Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2009-01-16 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Steve Sussman; Pallav Pokhrel; David Black; Matthew Kohrman; Stephen Hamann; Prakit Vateesatokit; Stephen E D Nsimba Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: James F Thrasher; Liling Huang; Rosaura Pérez-Hernández; Jeff Niederdeppe; Edna Arillo-Santillán; Jorge Alday Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gera E Nagelhout; Ute Mons; Shane Allwright; Romain Guignard; François Beck; Geoffrey T Fong; Hein de Vries; Marc C Willemsen Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2011-03-30 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Nancy L Fleischer; Paula Lozano; Edna Arillo Santillán; Luz Myriam Reynales Shigematsu; James F Thrasher Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2015-06-04 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Gera E Nagelhout; Tanya Wolfson; Yue-Lin Zhuang; Anthony Gamst; Marc C Willemsen; Shu-Hong Zhu Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Nick Wilson; Deepa Weerasekera; Tony Blakely; Richard Edwards; George Thomson; Heather Gifford Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-08-18 Impact factor: 3.295