Literature DB >> 17822000

Quantitative evaluation of a beam-matching procedure using one-dimensional gamma analysis.

Jan Hrbacek1, Tom Depuydt, An Nulens, Ans Swinnen, Frank Van den Heuvel.   

Abstract

This article provides a quantitative evaluation of Varian Medical Systems' beam matching procedure. A one-dimensional y analysis is employed to investigate the level of agreement of matched beams. A customized concept of one-dimensional gamma evaluation was designed. Our algorithm first performs a "local" fit of the reference and the evaluated datasets. For a particular point on the fitted evaluated curve, the y is derived as the shortest distance between the point and the fitted reference curve. This approach removes variations of the obtained y value related to the discrete character and noise in the original datasets. Criteria of 1 mm distance-to-agreement and 1% dose difference were used to evaluate the level of agreement of according profiles. Relative point and profile measurements were performed for all photon and electron beams of two Varian Clinacs 2100C/D. Matched beams show a good level of agreement. 70% of profiles completely pass the chosen criteria. The analysis of remaining 30% of the profiles demonstrates that measurement error becomes a limiting factor in achieving a better score. The highest obtained y value was 1.70. The quality of beam matching allowed us to treat according beams of both treatment units as "identical" and to use the reference beam data for the new unit. Nevertheless, the vendor's acceptance criteria of beam matching are much more benevolent. It might happen that the acceptance criteria are met, however, resulting quality of beam matching does not allow full interchangeability of beams.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17822000     DOI: 10.1118/1.2745239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  A mathematical approach to beam matching.

Authors:  B Sarkar; A Manikandan; M Nandy; M S Gossman; C S Sureka; A Ray; N Sujatha
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Evaluation of beam matching accuracy among six linacs from the same vendor.

Authors:  Chockkalingam Krishnappan; Chandrasekaran Anu Radha; Karunakaran Balaji; Prasanna Kumar Mani; Vendhan Subramani; Velmurugan Thanigaimalai; Madhan Kumar Gunasekaran; Velayudham Ramasubramanian
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-09-29

3.  Dosimetric analysis of beam-matching procedure of two similar linear accelerators.

Authors:  Janhavi R Bhangle; V K Sathiya Narayanan; Namitha K Kumar; R Vaitheeswaran
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2011-07

4.  Dosimetric Validation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy with Three 6MV Beam-Matched Linear Accelerators

Authors:  Sangaiah Ashokkumar; K M Ganesh; K Ramalingam; K Karthikeyan; N Jagadheeskumar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-12-29

5.  Enhanced dynamic wedge output factors for Varian 2300CD and the case for a reference database.

Authors:  Christopher F Njeh
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Dosimetric and mechanical equivalency of Varian TrueBeam linear accelerators.

Authors:  Mohammed Ghazal; Lars Södergren; Mathias Westermark; Julia Söderström; Tobias Pommer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Consistency of small-field dosimetry, on and off axis, in beam-matched linacs used for stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Luis Muñoz; Tomas Kron; Marco Petasecca; Joseph Bucci; Michael Jackson; Peter Metcalfe; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Giordano Biasi
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  A systematic study of independently-tuned room-specific PBS beam model in a beam-matched multiroom proton therapy system.

Authors:  Yu-Hua Huang; Chunfeng Fang; Tao Yang; Lin Cao; Gaolong Zhang; Baolin Qu; Yihang Zhang; Zishen Wang; Shouping Xu
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Commissioning measurements for photon beam data on three TrueBeam linear accelerators, and comparison with Trilogy and Clinac 2100 linear accelerators.

Authors:  Gloria P Beyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Is the dose distribution distorted in IMRT and RapidArc treatment when patient plans are swapped across beam-matched machines?

Authors:  Chockkalingam Krishnappan; Chandrasekaran Anu Radha; Vendhan Subramani; Madhan Kumar Gunasekaran
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.