Literature DB >> 12233766

Listening for bats: the hearing range of the bushcricket Phaneroptera falcata for bat echolocation calls measured in the field.

J Schul1, F Matt, O von Helversen.   

Abstract

The hearing range of the tettigoniid Phaneropterafalcata for the echolocation calls of freely flying mouseeared bats (Myotis myotis) was determined in the field. The hearing of the insect was monitored using hook electrode recordings from an auditory interneuron, which is as sensitive as the hearing organ for frequencies above 16 kHz. The flight path of the bat relative to the insect's position was tracked by recording the echolocation calls with two microphone arrays, and calculating the bat's position from the arrival time differences of the calls at each microphone. The hearing distances ranged from 13 to 30 m. The large variability appeared both between different insects and between different bat approaches to an individual insect. The escape time of the bushcricket, calculated from the detection distance of the insect and the instantaneous flight speed of the bat, ranged from 1.5 to more than 4s. The hearing ranges of bushcrickets suggest that the insect hears the approaching bat long before the bat can detect an echo from the flying insect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 12233766      PMCID: PMC1690743          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  3 in total

1.  Steering responses of flying crickets to sound and ultrasound: Mate attraction and predator avoidance.

Authors:  A Moiseff; G S Pollack; R R Hoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Ultrasonic startle behavior in bushcrickets (Orthoptera; Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  F Libersat; R R Hoy
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Acoustic sensitivity of the noctuid tympanic organ and its range for the cries of bats.

Authors:  K D Roeder
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1966-07       Impact factor: 2.354

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  Diversity of intersegmental auditory neurons in a bush cricket.

Authors:  Andreas Stumpner; Jorge Molina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Listening for males and bats: spectral processing in the hearing organ of Neoconocephalus bivocatus (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  Gerlinde Höbel; Johannes Schul
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-16       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Experimental and Theoretical Explorations of Traveling Waves and Tuning in the Bushcricket Ear.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Olson; Manuela Nowotny
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Sensory ecology of predator-prey interactions: responses of the AN2 interneuron in the field cricket, Teleogryllus oceanicus to the echolocation calls of sympatric bats.

Authors:  James H Fullard; John M Ratcliffe; Cassandra Guignion
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Reliable detection of predator cues in afferent spike trains of a katydid under high background noise levels.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Gerald Radspieler; Heiner Römer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  The cercal organ may provide singing tettigoniids a backup sensory system for the detection of eavesdropping bats.

Authors:  Manfred Hartbauer; Elisabeth Ofner; Viktoria Grossauer; Björn M Siemers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neuronal correlates of a preference for leading signals in the synchronizing bushcricket Mecopoda elongata (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae).

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; R Hashim; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  Acoustic localization of terrestrial wildlife: Current practices and future opportunities.

Authors:  Tessa A Rhinehart; Lauren M Chronister; Trieste Devlin; Justin Kitzes
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Maintaining acoustic communication at a cocktail party: heterospecific masking noise improves signal detection through frequency separation.

Authors:  M E Siegert; H Römer; M Hartbauer
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 3.312

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.