Literature DB >> 17766447

Substrate degradation kinetics, microbial diversity, and current efficiency of microbial fuel cells supplied with marine plankton.

Clare E Reimers1, Hilmar A Stecher, John C Westall, Yvan Alleau, Kate A Howell, Leslie Soule, Helen K White, Peter R Girguis.   

Abstract

The decomposition of marine plankton in two-chamber, seawater-filled microbial fuel cells (MFCs) has been investigated and related to resulting chemical changes, electrode potentials, current efficiencies, and microbial diversity. Six experiments were run at various discharge potentials, and a seventh served as an open-circuit control. The plankton consisted of a mixture of freshly captured phytoplankton and zooplankton (0.21 to 1 mm) added at an initial batch concentration of 27.5 mmol liter(-1) particulate organic carbon (OC). After 56.7 days, between 19.6 and 22.2% of the initial OC remained, sulfate reduction coupled to OC oxidation accounted for the majority of the OC that was degraded, and current efficiencies (of the active MFCs) were between 11.3 and 15.5%. In the open-circuit control cell, anaerobic plankton decomposition (as quantified by the decrease in total OC) could be modeled by three terms: two first-order reaction rate expressions (0.79 day(-1) and 0.037 day(-1), at 15 degrees C) and one constant, no-reaction term (representing 10.6% of the initial OC). However, in each active MFC, decomposition rates increased during the third week, lagging just behind periods of peak electricity generation. We interpret these decomposition rate changes to have been due primarily to the metabolic activity of sulfur-reducing microorganisms at the anode, a finding consistent with the electrochemical oxidization of sulfide to elemental sulfur and the elimination of inhibitory effects of dissolved sulfide. Representative phylotypes, found to be associated with anodes, were allied with Delta-, Epsilon-, and Gammaproteobacteria as well as the Flavobacterium-Cytophaga-Bacteroides and Fusobacteria. Based upon these results, we posit that higher current efficiencies can be achieved by optimizing plankton-fed MFCs for direct electron transfer from organic matter to electrodes, including microbial precolonization of high-surface-area electrodes and pulsed flowthrough additions of biomass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17766447      PMCID: PMC2074976          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01209-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  Production of electricity during wastewater treatment using a single chamber microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Hong Liu; Ramanathan Ramnarayanan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Tubular microbial fuel cells for efficient electricity generation.

Authors:  Korneel Rabaey; Peter Clauwaert; Peter Aelterman; Willy Verstraete
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Electricity generation from artificial wastewater using an upflow microbial fuel cell.

Authors:  Zhen He; Shelley D Minteer; Largus T Angenent
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Effect of electrode potential on electrode-reducing microbiota.

Authors:  David A Finkelstein; Leonard M Tender; J Gregory Zeikus
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Electron and carbon balances in microbial fuel cells reveal temporary bacterial storage behavior during electricity generation.

Authors:  Stefano Freguia; Korneel Rabaey; Zhiguo Yuan; Jürg Keller
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Competitive mechanisms for inhibition of sulfate reduction and methane production in the zone of ferric iron reduction in sediments.

Authors:  D R Lovley; E J Phillips
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes.

Authors:  Daniel R Bond; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Desulfuromonas acetoxidans gen. nov. and sp. nov., a new anaerobic, sulfur-reducing, acetate-oxidizing bacterium.

Authors:  N Pfennig; H Biebl
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1976-10-11       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Characterization of an autotrophic sulfide-oxidizing marine Arcobacter sp. that produces filamentous sulfur.

Authors:  C O Wirsen; S M Sievert; C M Cavanaugh; S J Molyneaux; A Ahmad; L T Taylor; E F DeLong; C D Taylor
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Microbial communities associated with electrodes harvesting electricity from a variety of aquatic sediments.

Authors:  D E Holmes; D R Bond; R A O'Neil; C E Reimers; L R Tender; D R Lovley
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 4.552

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Microbial fuel cells and microbial ecology: applications in ruminant health and production research.

Authors:  Orianna Bretschger; Jason B Osterstock; William E Pinchak; Shun'ichi Ishii; Karen E Nelson
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  The reaction of wastewater treatment and power generation of single chamber microbial fuel cell against substrate concentration and anode distributions.

Authors:  Sing-Mei Tan; Soon-An Ong; Li-Ngee Ho; Yee-Shian Wong; Wei-Eng Thung; Tean-Peng Teoh
Journal:  J Environ Health Sci Eng       Date:  2020-07-24

Review 3.  Outlook for benefits of sediment microbial fuel cells with two bio-electrodes.

Authors:  Liesje De Schamphelaire; Korneel Rabaey; Pascal Boeckx; Nico Boon; Willy Verstraete
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Simultaneous Investigation of Three Effective Parameters of Substrate, Microorganism Type and Reactor Design on Power Generation in a Dual-Chamber Microbial Fuel Cells.

Authors:  Fatemeh Nourbakhsh; Mohammad Pazouki; Mohsen Mohsennia
Journal:  Iran J Biotechnol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Impact of sediment parameters in the prediction of benthic microbial fuel cell performance.

Authors:  Kevin L Joiner; Gabriel L Tukeman; Anna Y Obraztsova; Yolanda Meriah Arias-Thode
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.036

6.  Bidirectional electroactive microbial biofilms and the role of biogenic sulfur in charge storage and release.

Authors:  Paniz Izadi; Marten Niklas Gey; Nicolas Schlüter; Uwe Schröder
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-07-07

7.  Convergent development of anodic bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells.

Authors:  Matthew D Yates; Patrick D Kiely; Douglas F Call; Hamid Rismani-Yazdi; Kyle Bibby; Jordan Peccia; John M Regan; Bruce E Logan
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 10.302

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.