Literature DB >> 17766144

Response normalized liquid chromatography nanospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Ragu Ramanathan1, Ruyun Zhong, Neil Blumenkrantz, Swapan K Chowdhury, Kevin B Alton.   

Abstract

The widely different LC-MS response observed for many structurally different compounds limits the use of LC-MS in full scan detection mode for quantitative determination of drugs and metabolites without using reference standard. The recently introduced nanospray ionization (NSI) technique shows comparable MS response for some compounds under non-LC-MS conditions. However, in the presence of numerous endogenous compounds commonly associated with biological samples such as urine, plasma, and bile, LC-MS is required to separate, detect, identify, and measure individual analytes. An LC-NSI-MS system was devised and the MS response obtained in this system for a variety of pharmaceutical drugs and their metabolites. The set-up involves two high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) systems, a chip-based NSI source and a quadrupole-time-of-flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer. Herein this is referred to as the response normalized-liquid chromatography NSI-MS (RNLC-NSI-MS) system. One HPLC unit performs the analytical separation, while the other unit adds solvent post-column with an exact reverse of the mobile phase composition such that the final composition entering the NSI source is isocratic throughout the entire HPLC run. The data obtained from four different structural classes of compounds [vicriviroc (VCV), desloratadine (DL), tolbutamide, and cocaine] and their metabolites indicate that by maintaining the solvent composition unchanged across the HPLC run, the influence of the solvent environment on the ionization efficiency is minimized. In comparison to responses obtained from radiochromatograms, responses from conventional LC-ESI-MS overestimated the VCV and DL responses, respectively, by 6- and 20-fold. Although VCV and DL responses obtained using LC-NSI-MS are within 2- to 6-fold from the respective radiochromatographic responses, the response normalization modification results in nearly uniform LC-NSI-MS response for all compounds evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17766144     DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 1044-0305            Impact factor:   3.109


  29 in total

1.  Selected reaction monitoring LC-MS determination of idoxifene and its pyrrolidinone metabolite in human plasma using robotic high-throughput, sequential sample injection.

Authors:  J M Onorato; J D Henion; P M Lefebvre; J P Kiplinger
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 2.  High-throughput quantitative bioanalysis by LC/MS/MS.

Authors:  M Jemal
Journal:  Biomed Chromatogr       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 1.902

3.  A fully integrated monolithic microchip electrospray device for mass spectrometry

Authors: 
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Effect of different solution flow rates on analyte ion signals in nano-ESI MS, or: when does ESI turn into nano-ESI?

Authors:  Andrea Schmidt; Michael Karas; Thomas Dülcks
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Universal response in liquid chromatography using charged aerosol detection.

Authors:  Tadeusz Górecki; Frederic Lynen; Roman Szucs; Pat Sandra
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  A review of nanoelectrospray ionization applications for drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Gurkeerat Singh; Bradley L Ackermann; Todd A Gillespie; Ajai K Chaudhary
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Analytical properties of the nanoelectrospray ion source.

Authors:  M Wilm; M Mann
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  1996-01-01       Impact factor: 6.986

8.  Validating regulatory-compliant wide dynamic range bioanalytical assays using chip-based nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Enaksha R Wickremsinhe; Bradley L Ackermann; Ajai K Chaudhary
Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Fully automated chip-based mass spectrometry for complex carbohydrate system analysis.

Authors:  Alina Zamfir; Sergey Vakhrushev; Alistair Sterling; Hans Jörg Niebel; Mark Allen; Jasna Peter-Katalinić
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 6.986

10.  A sensitive LC-MS/MS assay for the determination of dextromethorphan and metabolites in human urine--application for drug interaction studies assessing potential CYP3A and CYP2D6 inhibition.

Authors:  Shailesh S Vengurlekar; Jennifer Heitkamp; Fred McCush; Poonam R Velagaleti; Jerry H Brisson; Steven L Bramer
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 3.935

View more
  5 in total

1.  Small molecule quantification by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry for metabolites of drugs and drug candidates.

Authors:  Upendra P Dahal; Jeffrey P Jones; John A Davis; Dan A Rock
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.922

2.  NanoHPLC-nanoESI(+)-MS/MS quantitation of bis-N7-guanine DNA-DNA cross-links in tissues of B6C3F1 mice exposed to subppm levels of 1,3-butadiene.

Authors:  Dewakar Sangaraju; Melissa Goggin; Vernon Walker; James Swenberg; Natalia Tretyakova
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 6.986

3.  Selection of the optimum electrospray voltage for gradient elution LC-MS measurements.

Authors:  Ioan Marginean; Ryan T Kelly; Ronald J Moore; David C Prior; Brian L LaMarche; Keqi Tang; Richard D Smith
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 3.109

4.  Quantification of desloratadine in human plasma by LC-ESI-MS/MS and application to a pharmacokinetic study.

Authors:  Venkata Suresh Ponnuru; B R Challa; Ramarao Nadendla
Journal:  J Pharm Anal       Date:  2012-01-31

5.  Improved intensity-based label-free quantification via proximity-based intensity normalization (PIN).

Authors:  Susan K Van Riper; Ebbing P de Jong; LeeAnn Higgins; John V Carlis; Timothy J Griffin
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 4.466

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.