Literature DB >> 17761569

Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health.

Roberta A Downing1, Thomas A LaVeist, Heather E Bullock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined how ethnicity and social class influence women's perceptions of reproductive health care. Of primary interest was assessing whether health care providers are perceived as advising low-income women, particularly women of color, to limit their childbearing and to what extent they feel they are discouraged by providers from having future children.
METHODS: Ethnically diverse, low-income (n=193) and middle-class women (n=146) completed a questionnaire about their pregnancy-related health care experiences.
RESULTS: Logistic regression analyses revealed that low-income women of color experienced greater odds of being advised to limit their childbearing than did middle-class White women. A separate model demonstrated that low-income Latinas reported greater odds of being discouraged from having children than did middle-class White women.
CONCLUSIONS: Low-income women of color were more likely to report being advised to limit their childbearing and were more likely to describe being discouraged from having children than were middle-class White women. More research is needed regarding how ethnicity and social class impact women's experiences with reproductive health care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17761569      PMCID: PMC1994173          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  8 in total

1.  The politics of reproductive benefits: U.S. insurance coverage of contraceptive and infertility treatments.

Authors:  Leslie King; Madonna Harrington Meyer
Journal:  Gend Soc       Date:  1997-02

2.  The trouble with welfare. [Reviews of: Coll BD. Safety net: welfare and social security, 1929-1979. Rutgers Univeristy Press, 1995. Mink G. The wages of motherhood: inequality in the welfare state, 1917-1942. Cornell University press, 1995].

Authors:  T Skocpol
Journal:  Rev Am Hist       Date:  1996-12

3.  The enemy within: a commentary on the demonization of difference.

Authors:  R Sidel
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  1996-10

Review 4.  Cognitive and behavioral distancing from the poor.

Authors:  Bernice Lott
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2002-02

5.  The effect of race and sex on physicians' recommendations for cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  K A Schulman; J A Berlin; W Harless; J F Kerner; S Sistrunk; B J Gersh; R Dubé; C K Taleghani; J E Burke; S Williams; J M Eisenberg; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Assessing the effects of welfare reform policies on reproductive and infant health.

Authors:  P Wise; W Chavkin; D Romero
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Social and clinical correlates of postpartum sterilization in the United States, 1972 and 1980.

Authors:  W D Mosher; K G Keppel
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1984 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Socioeconomic status and risk for substandard medical care.

Authors:  H R Burstin; S R Lipsitz; T A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-11-04       Impact factor: 56.272

  8 in total
  35 in total

Review 1.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Rachel Ruskin; Kevin Grumbach; Eric Vittinghoff; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Dean Schillinger; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Liza Fuentes; Amy Allina
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-05-23

4.  Talking about male body-based contraceptives: The counseling visit and the feminization of contraception.

Authors:  Katrina Kimport
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Contraceptive Decision Making Among Latina Immigrants: Developing Theory-Based Survey Items.

Authors:  Diana N Carvajal; Paola C Rivera Mudafort; Beth Barnet; Arthur E Blank
Journal:  Hisp Health Care Int       Date:  2019-10-24

6.  Frustrated demand for sterilization among low-income Latinas in El Paso, Texas.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Sarah McKinnon; Michele G Shedlin; Jon Amastae; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2012-10-11

7.  What Women Want: A Qualitative Study of Contraception in Jail.

Authors:  Dana Schonberg; Ariana H Bennett; Carolyn Sufrin; Alison Karasz; Marji Gold
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 8.  Disparities in family planning.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Maria Isabel Rodriguez; Kira Levy; Sonya Borrero; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Evaluating the Whoops Proof S.C. Campaign: A Pair-Matched Group Pretest-Posttest Quasi-experimental Study.

Authors:  Beth Sundstrom; Deborah Billings; Ellie Smith; Merissa Ferrara; Bill Albert; Katherine Suellentrop
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2019-08

10.  The impact of patient race on clinical decisions related to prescribing HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): assumptions about sexual risk compensation and implications for access.

Authors:  Sarah K Calabrese; Valerie A Earnshaw; Kristen Underhill; Nathan B Hansen; John F Dovidio
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.