Literature DB >> 1775660

Single band amplitude envelope cues as an aid to speechreading.

K W Grant1, L D Braida, R J Renn.   

Abstract

Amplitude envelopes derived from speech have been shown to facilitate speech-reading to varying degrees, depending on how the envelope signals were extracted and presented and on the amount of training given to the subjects. In this study, three parameters related to envelope extraction and presentation were examined using both easy and difficult sentence materials: (1) the bandwidth and centre frequency of the filtered speech signal used to obtain the envelope; (2) the bandwidth of the envelope signal determined by the lowpass filter cutoff frequency used to "smooth" the envelope fluctuations; and (3) the carrier signal used to convey the envelope cues. Results for normal hearing subjects following a brief visual and auditory-visual familiarization/training period showed that (1) the envelope derived from wideband speech does not provide the greatest benefit to speechreading when compared to envelopes derived from selected octave bands of speech; (2) as the bandwidth centred around the carrier frequency increased from 12.5 to 1600 Hz, auditory-visual (AV) performance obtained with difficult sentence materials improved, especially for envelopes derived from high-frequency speech energy; (3) envelope bandwidths below 25 Hz resulted in AV scores that were sometimes equal to or worse than speechreading alone; (4) for each filtering condition tested, there was at least one bandwidth and carrier condition that produced AV scores that were significantly greater than speechreading alone; (5) low-frequency carriers were better than high-frequency or wideband carriers for envelopes derived from an octave band of speech centred at 500 Hz; and (6) low-frequency carriers were worse than high-frequency or wideband carriers for envelopes derived from an octave band centred at 3150 Hz. These results suggest that amplitude envelope cues can provide a substantial benefit to speechreading for both easy and difficult sentence materials, but that frequency transposition of these signals to regions remote from their "natural" spectral locations may result in reduced performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1775660     DOI: 10.1080/14640749108400990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  8 in total

1.  Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Jeff Carroll; Stephanie Tiaden; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Auditory-visual speech perception in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.

Authors:  Sheetal Desai; Ginger Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Differential contribution of envelope fluctuations across frequency to consonant identification in quiet.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Use of speech-modulated noise adds strong "bottom-up" cues for phonemic restoration.

Authors:  J A Bashford; R M Warren; C A Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-04

5.  Spectral integration of English speech for non-native English speakers.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spectral integration and bandwidth effects on speech recognition in school-aged children and adults.

Authors:  Stefan Mlot; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Aging and Spectro-Temporal Integration of Speech.

Authors:  John H Grose; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  The contribution of visual information to the perception of speech in noise with and without informative temporal fine structure.

Authors:  Paula C Stacey; Pádraig T Kitterick; Saffron D Morris; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 3.208

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.