Literature DB >> 1774248

Use of a urine enzyme immunoassay as a diagnostic tool for Chlamydia trachomatis urethritis in men.

J R Schwebke1, A M Clark, M B Pettinger, P Nsubga, W E Stamm.   

Abstract

We collected first-voided urine specimens from 659 males attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic and performed both enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of chlamydial antigen and leukocyte esterase testing on these urine samples. The overall prevalence of chlamydial urethritis in the study population as determined by culture of urethral swabs was 11%. However, 46% of all men in the study had no symptoms of urethritis. Compared with urethral cultures for chlamydiae, the urine EIA had a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 99%. The sensitivity of the EIA strongly correlated with the amount of antigen present in culture as assessed by numbers of inclusion-forming units. The sensitivity of the leukocyte esterase test compared with that of chlamydia culture was 88%. We conclude that in this population of men, which included many patients without symptoms of urethritis, the urine EIA was a relatively insensitive means of screening for chlamydial infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1774248      PMCID: PMC270353          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.29.11.2446-2449.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  8 in total

1.  Rapid, on-site diagnosis of chlamydial urethritis in men by detection of antigens in urethral swabs and urine.

Authors:  J Sellors; J Mahony; D Jang; L Pickard; S Castriciano; S Landis; I Stewart; W Seidelman; I Cunningham; M Chernesky
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of urethral swabs, urine, and urinary sediment for the isolation of Chlamydia.

Authors:  T F Smith; L A Weed
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of three Chlamydia trachomatis immunoassays with an unbiased, noninvasive clinical sample.

Authors:  I D Paul; E O Caul
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens in urine as an alternative to swabs and cultures.

Authors:  M Chernesky; S Castriciano; J Sellors; I Stewart; I Cunningham; S Landis; W Seidelman; L Grant; C Devlin; J Mahony
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  Urinary leukocyte esterase screening test for asymptomatic chlamydial and gonococcal infections in males.

Authors:  M A Shafer; J Schachter; A B Moscicki; A Weiss; J Shalwitz; E Vaughan; S G Millstein
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-11-10       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Dipstick leukocyte esterase activity in first-catch urine specimens. A useful screening test for detecting sexually transmitted disease in the adolescent male.

Authors:  M D Sadof; E R Woods; S J Emans
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-10-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 7.  Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genitourinary infections.

Authors:  W E Stamm
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis inclusions in Mccoy cell cultures with fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  W E Stamm; M Tam; M Koester; L Cles
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.948

  8 in total
  16 in total

1.  The value of non-culture techniques for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis infections: making the best of a bad job.

Authors:  D Taylor-Robinson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Control of genital chlamydial infection.

Authors:  P R Gully; R W Peeling
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-05

3.  Pooling urine samples for ligase chain reaction screening for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in asymptomatic women.

Authors:  K A Kacena; S B Quinn; M R Howell; G E Madico; T C Quinn; C A Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Ability of commercial ligase chain reaction and PCR assays to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis infections in men by testing first-void urine.

Authors:  M A Chernesky; S Chong; D Jang; K Luinstra; J Sellors; J B Mahony
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine from men with urethritis.

Authors:  M Bäckman; A K Rudén; O Ringertz; E G Sandström
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Non-invasive sampling for detection of genital infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in males utilising urinary leukocyte esterase tests and immunoassays.

Authors:  M A Domeika; M Bassiri; P A Mårdh
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Factors affecting urine EIA sensitivity in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in men.

Authors:  H Talbot; B Romanowski
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-04

8.  Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in general practice urine samples.

Authors:  M S Dryden; M Wilkinson; M Redman; M R Millar
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men.

Authors:  J M Ehret; J C Leszcynski; J M Douglas; S L Genova; M A Chernesky; J Moncada; J Schachter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Evaluation of three immunoassays for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from asymptomatic males.

Authors:  G P Leonardi; M Seitz; R Edstrom; J Cruz; P Costello; K Szabo
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.