Literature DB >> 21927822

Sensitivity of patient-specific vertebral finite element model from low dose imaging to material properties and loading conditions.

Christophe Travert1, Erwan Jolivet, Emilie Sapin-de Brosses, David Mitton, Wafa Skalli.   

Abstract

Patient-specific modeling could help in predicting vertebral osteoporotic fracture. The accuracy requirement for input data available in clinical routine is related to the model sensitivity. The objective of this study is to assess the relative impact of material properties and of loading conditions on vertebral strength using a finite element model. Fourteen subject-specific vertebral finite element models were used to investigate the effect of material properties and loading conditions. A design of experiment was set to study three parameters: Young's moduli of trabecular bone and cortico-trabecular bone (outer 3 mm of the vertebra), and load location. Cortico-trabecular bone modulus variation from 270 to 478 MPa made fracture load vary from 22 to 51%, depending on other parameters. Trabecular bone modulus variation from 115 to 258 MPa made fracture load vary from 11 to 43%. Displacing load location by 1 cm resulted in a mean decrease of 48-60% of the fracture load. Anterior bending induced strain concentration in vertebral anterior wall. Material properties of both type of bone have about the same effect. Load location is the most sensitive. Effort should be made to take into account patients' specific load distribution regarding its sagittal balance, in addition to bone properties.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21927822     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-011-0825-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  28 in total

1.  Finite element modeling of the human thoracolumbar spine.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; David L Kopperdahl; William S Rosenberg; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Christopher E Cann; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA): a method for reconstruction of human bones using a dual X-ray absorptiometry device.

Authors:  S Kolta; A Le Bras; D Mitton; V Bousson; J A de Guise; J Fechtenbaum; J D Laredo; C Roux; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  In vivo assessment of lumbar vertebral strength in elderly women using computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element model.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Imai; Isao Ohnishi; Seizo Yamamoto; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  In vivo 3D reconstruction of human vertebrae with the three-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry (3D-XA) method.

Authors:  S Kolta; S Quiligotti; A Ruyssen-Witrand; A Amido; D Mitton; A Le Bras; W Skalli; C Roux
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Relationship between axial and bending behaviors of the human thoracolumbar vertebra.

Authors:  R Paul Crawford; Tony M Keaveny
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A dynamic investigation of the burst fracture process using a combined experimental and finite element approach.

Authors:  R K Wilcox; D J Allen; R M Hall; D Limb; D C Barton; R A Dickson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Relative strength of thoracic vertebrae in axial compression versus flexion.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Calvin C Kuo; Liu C Cheng; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway; Craig Slyfield; Vedat Deviren; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  Structural determinants of vertebral fracture risk.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; B Lawrence Riggs; Tony M Keaveny; Sara J Achenbach; Paul F Hoffmann; Jon J Camp; Peggy A Rouleau; Mary L Bouxsein; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Richard A Robb; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Prediction of vertebral strength under loading conditions occurring in activities of daily living using a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method.

Authors:  Takuya Matsumoto; Isao Ohnishi; Masahiko Bessho; Kazuhiro Imai; Satoru Ohashi; Kozo Nakamura
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effect of postural alignment alteration with age on vertebral strength.

Authors:  C Heidsieck; L Gajny; C Travert; J-Y Lazennec; W Skalli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 5.071

2.  Effects of densitometry, material mapping and load estimation uncertainties on the accuracy of patient-specific finite-element models of the scapula.

Authors:  Gianni Campoli; Bart Bolsterlee; Frans van der Helm; Harrie Weinans; Amir A Zadpoor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  A framework for the study of multiple realizations: the importance of levels of analysis.

Authors:  Morten Overgaard; Jesper Mogensen
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  A Review on Multiscale Bone Damage: From the Clinical to the Research Perspective.

Authors:  Federica Buccino; Chiara Colombo; Laura Maria Vergani
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.