Literature DB >> 17721713

Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.

Seok Woo Kim1, Jae Hyuk Shin, Jose Joefrey Arbatin, Moon Soo Park, Yung Khee Chung, Paul C McAfee.   

Abstract

The object of this study is to review the early clinical results and radiographic outcomes following insertion of the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Memphis, TN), together with its effect on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit (FSU) and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine for the treatment of single-level or two-level symptomatic disc disease. Forty-seven patients with symptomatic single or two-level cervical disc disease who received the Bryan Cervical Artificial Disc were reviewed prospectively. A total of 55 Bryan disc were placed in 47 patients. A single-level procedure was performed in 39 patients and a two-level procedure in the other eight. Radiographic and clinical assessments were made preoperatively and at 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 and up to 33 months postoperatively. Mean follow-up duration was 24 months, ranging from 13 to 33 months. Periods were categorized as early follow up (1.5-3 months) and late follow up (6-33 months). The visual analogue scale (VAS), neck disability index(NDI), Odom's criteria were used to assess pain and clinical outcomes. Static and dynamic radiographs were measured by hand and computer to determine the range of motion (ROM), the angle of the functional segmental unit (FSU), and the overall cervical alignment (C2-7 Cobb angle). With all of these data, we evaluated the change of the preoperative lordosis (or kyphosis) of the FSU and Overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine during the follow-up period. There was a statistically significant improvement in the VAS score from 7.0 +/- 2.6 to 2.0 +/- 1.5 (paired-t test, P = 0.000), and in the NDI from 21.5 +/- 5.5 to 4.5 +/- 3.9 (paired-t test P = 0.000). All of the patients were satisfied with the surgical results by Odom's criteria. The postoperative ROM of the implanted level was preserved without significant difference from preoperative ROM of the operated level. Only 36% of patients with a preoperative lordotic sagittal orientation of the FSU were able to maintain lordosis following surgery. However, the overall sagittal alignment of the cervical spine was preserved in 86% of cases at the final follow up. Interestingly, preoperatively kyphotic FSU resulted in lordotic FSU in 13% of patients during the late follow-up, and preoperatively kyphotic overall cervical alignment resulted in lordosis in 33% of the patients postoperatively. Clinical results are encouraging, with significant improvement seen in the Bryan Cervical Artificial disc. The Bryan disc preserves motion of the FSU. Although the preoperative lordosis (or kyphosis) of the FSU could not always be maintained during the follow-up period, the overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine was usually preserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17721713      PMCID: PMC2365535          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0459-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  29 in total

1.  Cervical motion segment replacement.

Authors:  Vincent E Bryan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion.

Authors:  Jason C Eck; S Craig Humphreys; Tae-Hong Lim; Soon Tack Jeong; Jesse G Kim; Scott D Hodges; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Internal stress distribution in cervical intervertebral discs: the influence of an artificial cervical joint and simulated anterior interbody fusion.

Authors:  Crispin C Wigfield; Daniel Skrzypiec; Andre Jackowski; Mike A Adams
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-10

4.  Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate.

Authors:  Denis J DiAngelo; James T Roberston; Newton H Metcalf; Bobby J McVay; R Champ Davis
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2003-08

5.  Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) versus anterior cervical fusion (ACF), clinical and radiological outcome study.

Authors:  N Abd-Alrahman; A S Dokmak; A Abou-Madawi
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.216

6.  Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement.

Authors:  Christoph Mehren; Petr Suchomel; Frank Grochulla; Pavel Barsa; Petra Sourkova; Jan Hradil; Andreas Korge; H Michael Mayer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Instability of the cervical spine after anterior interbody fusion. A study on its incidence and clinical significance in 21 patients.

Authors:  J R Döhler; M R Kahn; S P Hughes
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1985

8.  Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Rosella Sgrambiglia; Vincent Pointillart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients.

Authors:  D R Gore; S B Sepic
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis.

Authors:  Jan Goffin; Adrian Casey; Pierre Kehr; Klaus Liebig; Bengt Lind; Carlo Logroscino; Vincent Pointillart; Frank Van Calenbergh; Johannes van Loon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  32 in total

Review 1.  Cervical spine alignment in disc arthroplasty: should we change our perspective?

Authors:  Alberto Di Martino; Rocco Papalia; Erika Albo; Leonardo Cortesi; Luca Denaro; Vincenzo Denaro
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The demands of professional opera singing on cranio-cervical posture.

Authors:  Gillian Johnson; Margot Skinner
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinical and radiographic reports following cervical arthroplasty: a 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Yan Cai Yang; Lin Nie; Lei Cheng; Yong Hou
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [The relevance of the sagittal profile in cervical artificial discs].

Authors:  C Carstens; M Carstens; F Copf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Parameters that effect spine biomechanics following cervical disc replacement.

Authors:  Vijay K Goel; Ahmad Faizan; Vivek Palepu; Sanghita Bhattacharya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Footprint mismatch in total cervical disc arthroplasty.

Authors:  Martin Thaler; Sebastian Hartmann; Michaela Gstöttner; Ricarda Lechner; Michael Gabl; Christian Bach
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 7.  Does design matter? Cervical disc replacements under review.

Authors:  Michael D Staudt; Kaushik Das; Neil Duggal
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 3.042

8.  Outcomes of the Bryan cervical disc replacement: fifteen year follow-up.

Authors:  Vincent Pointillart; Jean-Etienne Castelain; Pierre Coudert; Derek Thomas Cawley; Olivier Gille; Jean-Marc Vital
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Using the modified Delphi method to establish a new Chinese clinical consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Lei Zang; Ning Fan; Yong Hai; S B Lu; Q J Su; J C Yang; Peng Du; Y J Gao
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparative analysis of cervical arthroplasty using mobi-c(r) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using the solis(r) -cage.

Authors:  Jin Hoon Park; Kwang Ho Roh; Ji Young Cho; Young Shin Ra; Seung Chul Rhim; Sung Woo Noh
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2008-10-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.