Literature DB >> 17712706

Grappling with groups: protecting collective interests in biomedical research.

Richard R Sharp1, Morris W Foster.   

Abstract

Strategies for protecting historically disadvantaged groups have been extensively debated in the context of genetic variation research, making this a useful starting point in examining the protection of social groups from harm resulting from biomedical research. We analyze research practices developed in response to concerns about the involvement of indigenous communities in studies of genetic variation and consider their potential application in other contexts. We highlight several conceptual ambiguities and practical challenges associated with the protection of group interests and argue that protectionist strategies developed in the context of genetic research will not be easily adapted to other types of research in which social groups are placed at risk. We suggest that it is this set of conceptual and practical issues that philosophers, ethicists, and others should focus on in their efforts to protect identifiable social groups from harm resulting from biomedical research.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17712706     DOI: 10.1080/03605310701515419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  8 in total

1.  2010 Presidential Address: Culture: the silent language geneticists must learn--genetic research with indigenous populations.

Authors:  Roderick R McInnes
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  The Human Microbiome Project: lessons from human genomics.

Authors:  Cecil M Lewis; Alexandra Obregón-Tito; Raul Y Tito; Morris W Foster; Paul G Spicer
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 17.079

3.  Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research?

Authors:  Mark A Rothstein
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 4.  Bioethics methods in the ethical, legal, and social implications of the human genome project literature.

Authors:  Rebecca L Walker; Clair Morrissey
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 1.898

5.  Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.

Authors:  Richard R Fabsitz; Amy McGuire; Richard R Sharp; Mona Puggal; Laura M Beskow; Leslie G Biesecker; Ebony Bookman; Wylie Burke; Esteban Gonzalez Burchard; George Church; Ellen Wright Clayton; John H Eckfeldt; Conrad V Fernandez; Rebecca Fisher; Stephanie M Fullerton; Stacey Gabriel; Francine Gachupin; Cynthia James; Gail P Jarvik; Rick Kittles; Jennifer R Leib; Christopher O'Donnell; P Pearl O'Rourke; Laura Lyman Rodriguez; Sheri D Schully; Alan R Shuldiner; Rebecca K F Sze; Joseph V Thakuria; Susan M Wolf; Gregory L Burke
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Genet       Date:  2010-12

6.  Patient perspectives on group benefits and harms in genetic research.

Authors:  A J Goldenberg; S C Hull; B S Wilfond; R R Sharp
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Confronting real time ethical, legal, and social issues in the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Consortium.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton; Maureen Smith; Stephanie M Fullerton; Wylie Burke; Catherine A McCarty; Barbara A Koenig; Amy L McGuire; Laura M Beskow; Lynn Dressler; Amy A Lemke; Erin M Ramos; Laura Lyman Rodriguez
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Reconstructing communities in cluster trials?

Authors:  Sapfo Lignou; Sushmita Das; Jigna Mistry; Glyn Alcock; Neena Shah More; David Osrin; Sarah J L Edwards
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.