Literature DB >> 17711839

Habitat assessment ability of bumble-bees implies frequency-dependent selection on floral rewards and display size.

Jay M Biernaskie1, Robert J Gegear.   

Abstract

Foraging pollinators could visit hundreds of flowers in succession on mass-flowering plants, yet they often visit only a small number--potentially saving the plant from much self-pollination among its own flowers (geitonogamy). This study tests the hypothesis that bumble-bee (Bombus impatiens) residence on a particular plant depends on an assessment of that plant's reward value relative to the overall quality experienced in the habitat. In a controlled environment, naive bees were given experience in a particular habitat (all plants having equal nectar quality or number of rewarding flowers), and we tested whether they learn about and adaptively exploit a new habitat type. Bees' residence on a plant (number of flowers probed per visit) was eventually invariant to a doubling of absolute nectar quality and increased only slightly with a doubling of absolute flower number in the habitat. These results help to explain why pollinators are quick to leave highly rewarding plants and suggest that the fitness of rewarding plant traits will often be frequency dependent. One implication is that geitonogamy may be a less significant constraint on the evolution of rewarding traits than generally supposed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17711839      PMCID: PMC2275883          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  7 in total

1.  Dimensionless invariants from foraging theory's marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov; G A Parker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens.

Authors:  J D Karron; R J Mitchell; K G Holmquist; J M Bell; B Funk
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Mating strategies in flowering plants: the outcrossing-selfing paradigm and beyond.

Authors:  Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Adaptive plasticity of floral display size in animal-pollinated plants.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

6.  Geitonogamy: The neglected side of selfing.

Authors:  T J de Jong; N M Waser; P G Klinkhamer
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  The evolution and maintenance of monoecy and dioecy in Sagittaria latifolia (Alismataceae).

Authors:  Marcel E Dorken; Jannice Friedman; Spencer C H Barrett
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.694

  7 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  How do pollinator visitation rate and seed set relate to species' floral traits and community context?

Authors:  Amparo Lázaro; Anna Jakobsson; Ørjan Totland
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Human occipital cortices differentially exert saccadic suppression: Intracranial recording in children.

Authors:  Mitsugu Uematsu; Naoyuki Matsuzaki; Erik C Brown; Katsuaki Kojima; Eishi Asano
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Spatial variation in selection on corolla shape in a generalist plant is promoted by the preference patterns of its local pollinators.

Authors:  José M Gómez; Jordi Bosch; Francisco Perfectti; J D Fernández; Mohamed Abdelaziz; J P M Camacho
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Recognition and avoidance of contaminated flowers by foraging bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Authors:  Bertrand Fouks; H Michael G Lattorff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Habitat effects on reproductive phenotype, pollinator behavior, fecundity, and mating outcomes of a bumble bee-pollinated herb.

Authors:  Hao Tian; Lawrence D Harder; Ai-Ying Wang; Da-Yong Zhang; Wan-Jin Liao
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.325

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.