Literature DB >> 14666135

The influence of floral display size on selfing rates in Mimulus ringens.

J D Karron1, R J Mitchell, K G Holmquist, J M Bell, B Funk.   

Abstract

Pollinators often visit several flowers in sequence on plants with large floral displays. This foraging pattern is expected to influence the rate of self-fertilization in self-compatible taxa. To quantify the effects of daily floral display on pollinator movements and selfing, we experimentally manipulated flower number in four replicate (cloned) arrays of Mimulus ringens (Scrophulariaceae), each consisting of genets with unique combinations of homozygous marker genotypes. Four display classes (two, four, eight and 16 flowers) were present in each array. Pollinator visitation rate per flower and seed set per fruit were unaffected by display. However, flower number strongly influenced the frequency of within-plant pollinator movements, which increased from 13.8% of probes on two-flower displays to 77.6% of probes on 16-flower displays. The proportion of within-plant movements was significantly correlated with selfing (r = 0.993). The increase from 22.9% selfing on two-flower displays to 37.3% selfing on 16-flower displays reflects changes in the extent of geitonogamous self-pollination. We estimate that approximately half of all selfing on 16-flower displays resulted from geitonogamy. Selfing also varied dramatically among fruits within display classes. Nested ANOVA indicates that differences among flowers on two-flower ramets accounted for 45.4% of the variation in selfing, differences among genets accounted for 16.1% of the variation, and statistical and sampling error accounted for 38.5% of the variation. Differences among flowers within ramets may reflect the order of sequential floral probes on a display.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14666135     DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  29 in total

1.  New perspectives on the evolution of plant mating systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karron; Christopher T Ivey; Randall J Mitchell; Michael R Whitehead; Rod Peakall; Andrea L Case
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The effects of phenological mismatches on demography.

Authors:  Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Toke Thomas Høye; David W Inouye; Eric Post
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Ecology and evolution of plant-pollinator interactions.

Authors:  Randall J Mitchell; Rebecca E Irwin; Rebecca J Flanagan; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Trapline foraging by pollinators: its ontogeny, economics and possible consequences for plants.

Authors:  Kazuharu Ohashi; James D Thomson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2009-04-26       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Longer visits on familiar plants? Testing a regular visitor's tendency to probe more flowers than occasional visitors.

Authors:  Takashi T Makino
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-06-21

6.  Influence of spatial distribution and size of clones on the realized outcrossing rate of the marsh cinquefoil (Comarum palustre).

Authors:  L Somme; C Mayer; O Raspé; A-L Jacquemart
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 7.  The impact of plant and flower age on mating patterns.

Authors:  Diane L Marshall; Joy J Avritt; Satya Maliakal-Witt; Juliana S Medeiros; Marieken G M Shaner
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Effects of floral display size on male and female reproductive success in Mimulus ringens.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Karron; Randall J Mitchell
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  The relative importance of reproductive assurance and automatic selection as hypotheses for the evolution of self-fertilization.

Authors:  Jeremiah W Busch; Lynda F Delph
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Habitat assessment ability of bumble-bees implies frequency-dependent selection on floral rewards and display size.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie; Robert J Gegear
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.