Literature DB >> 16321788

Adaptive plasticity of floral display size in animal-pollinated plants.

Lawrence D Harder1, Steven D Johnson.   

Abstract

Plants need not participate passively in their own mating, despite their immobility and reliance on pollen vectors. Instead, plants may respond to their recent pollination experience by adjusting the number of flowers that they display simultaneously. Such responsiveness could arise from the dependence of floral display size on the longevity of individual flowers, which varies with pollination rate in many plant species. By hand-pollinating some inflorescences, but not others, we demonstrate plasticity in display size of the orchid Satyrium longicauda. Pollination induced flower wilting, but did not affect the opening of new flowers, so that within a few days pollinated inflorescences displayed fewer flowers than unpollinated inflorescences. During subsequent exposure to intensive natural pollination, pollen removal and receipt increased proportionally with increasing display size, whereas pollen-removal failure and self-pollination accelerated. Such benefit-cost relations allow plants that adjust display size in response to the prevailing pollination rate to increase their attractiveness when pollinators are rare (large displays), or to limit mating costs when pollinators are abundant (small displays). Seen from this perspective, pollination-induced flower wilting serves the entire plant by allowing it to display the number of flowers that is appropriate for the current pollination environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16321788      PMCID: PMC1559982          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3268

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  7 in total

1.  Evolution of floral display in Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae): direct and correlated responses to selection on flower size and number.

Authors:  A C Worley; S C Barrett
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Genetic cost of reproductive assurance in a self-fertilizing plant.

Authors:  Christopher R Herlihy; Christopher G Eckert
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Variation among floral visitors in pollination ability: a precondition for mutualism specialization.

Authors:  D W Schemske; C C Horvitz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1984-08-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A new technique for monitoring pollen flow in orchids.

Authors:  R Peakall
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effects of stigma age on receptivity in Silene alba (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  Helen J Young; Lauren Gravitz
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.844

6.  Costs and limits of phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  T J Dewitt; A Sih; D S Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-02-01       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Costs of phenotypic plasticity.

Authors:  Rick A Relyea
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.926

  7 in total
  25 in total

1.  Doing the twist: A test of Darwin's cross-pollination hypothesis for pollinarium reconfiguration.

Authors:  Craig I Peter; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Relationships between population size and pollen fates in a moth-pollinated orchid.

Authors:  Steven D Johnson; Erica Torninger; Jon Agren
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Effect of pollination on floral longevity and costs of delaying fertilization in the out-crossing Polygala vayredae Costa (Polygalaceae).

Authors:  Sílvia Castro; Paulo Silveira; Luis Navarro
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Plasticity comparisons between plants and animals: Concepts and mechanisms.

Authors:  Renee M Borges
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2008-06

5.  Flowers anticipate revisits of pollinators by learning from previously experienced visitation intervals.

Authors:  Moritz Mittelbach; Sandro Kolbaia; Maximilian Weigend; Tilo Henning
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2019-03-26

Review 6.  Plant-pollinator interactions along the pathway to paternity.

Authors:  Corneile Minnaar; Bruce Anderson; Marinus L de Jager; Jeffrey D Karron
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 7.  The interplay between inflorescence development and function as the crucible of architectural diversity.

Authors:  Lawrence D Harder; Przemyslaw Prusinkiewicz
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-12-13       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Large and abundant flowers increase indirect costs of corollas: a study of coflowering sympatric Mediterranean species of contrasting flower size.

Authors:  Alberto L Teixido; Fernando Valladares
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Plasticity of floral longevity and floral display in the self-compatible biennial Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae): untangling the role of multiple components of pollination.

Authors:  Rachel B Spigler
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Habitat assessment ability of bumble-bees implies frequency-dependent selection on floral rewards and display size.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie; Robert J Gegear
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.