Literature DB >> 17710517

Simulating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fuzzy-parameterized models: a comparison of numerical methods.

Kok-Yong Seng1, Ivan Nestorov, Paolo Vicini.   

Abstract

Statistical techniques have been traditionally used to deal with parametric variation in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models, but these require substantial data for estimates of probability distributions. In the presence of limited, inaccurate or imprecise information, simulation with fuzzy numbers represents an alternative tool to handle parametric uncertainty. Existing methods for implementing fuzzy arithmetic may, however, have significant shortcomings in overestimating (e.g., conventional fuzzy arithmetic) and underestimating (e.g., vertex method) the output uncertainty. The purpose of the present study is to apply and compare the applicability of conventional fuzzy arithmetic, vertex method and two recently proposed numerical schemes, namely transformation and optimization methods, for uncertainty modeling in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fuzzy-parameterized systems. A series of test problems were examined, including empirical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models, a function non-monotonic in its parameters, and a whole body physiologically based pharmacokinetic model. Our results verified that conventional fuzzy arithmetic can lead to overestimation of response uncertainty and should be avoided. For the monotonic pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models, the vertex method accurately predicted fuzzy-valued output while incurring the least computational cost. It turned out that the choice of a suitable method for fuzzy simulation of the non-monotonic function depended on the required accuracy of the results: the vertex method was capable of eliciting an initial approximate solution with few function evaluations; for more accurate results, the transformation method was the most superior approach in terms of accuracy per unit CPU time.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17710517     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-007-9061-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  14 in total

1.  Elicitation of quantitative data from a heterogeneous expert panel: formal process and application in animal health.

Authors:  Ine H J Van der Fels-Klerx; Louis H J Goossens; Helmut W Saatkamp; Suzan H S Horst
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Correlation and predictive performances of saliva and plasma nicotine concentration on tobacco withdrawal-induced craving.

Authors:  Vincenzo Teneggi; Lisa Squassante; Laura Iavarone; Stefano Milleri; Alan Bye; Roberto Gomeni
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  Uncertainties in estimates of the risks of late effects from space radiation.

Authors:  F A Cucinotta; W Schimmerling; J W Wilson; L E Peterson; P B Saganti; J F Dicello
Journal:  Adv Space Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.152

4.  Use of probabilistic modeling within a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict sulfamethazine residue withdrawal times in edible tissues in swine.

Authors:  Jennifer Buur; Ronald Baynes; Geof Smith; Jim Riviere
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Population pharmacokinetics meta-analysis of recombinant human erythropoietin in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Per Olsson-Gisleskog; Philippe Jacqmin; Juan Jose Perez-Ruixo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Prediction of diazepam disposition in the rat and man by a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Y Igari; Y Sugiyama; Y Sawada; T Iga; M Hanano
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1983-12

Review 7.  Kinetics of pharmacologic response.

Authors:  N H Holford; L B Sheiner
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Pharmacokinetic model-predicted anticancer drug concentrations in human tumors.

Authors:  James M Gallo; Paolo Vicini; Amy Orlansky; Shaolan Li; Feng Zhou; Jianguo Ma; Sharon Pulfer; Michel A Bookman; Ping Guo
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Regional blood flow in conscious resting rats determined by microsphere distribution.

Authors:  I Kuwahira; N C Gonzalez; N Heisler; J Piiper
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-01

10.  Comparative physiological pharmacokinetics of fentanyl and alfentanil in rats and humans based on parametric single-tissue models.

Authors:  S Björkman; D R Wada; D R Stanski; W F Ebling
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1994-10
View more
  1 in total

1.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of drug disposition in rat and human: a fuzzy arithmetic approach.

Authors:  Kok-Yong Seng; Ivan Nestorov; Paolo Vicini
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 4.200

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.