OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to describe the pharmacokinetics of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in healthy subjects, after intravenous and subcutaneous administration over a wide dose range, and to examine the influence of demographic characteristics and other covariates on the pharmacokinetic parameters of rHuEPO. METHODS: Erythropoietin serum concentration data were available from 16 studies comprising 49 healthy subjects who received rHuEPO intravenous doses from 10 to 300 IU/kg, 427 healthy subjects who received rHuEPO subcutaneous doses from 1 to 2400 IU/kg, and 57 healthy subjects who received placebo and where endogenous erythropoietin concentrations were measured. Different pharmacokinetic models were fitted to the dataset using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software (NONMEM, Version V, Level 1). Several patient covariates were tested in order to quantify the effect on rHuEPO pharmacokinetic parameters. Model evaluation was examined using a posterior predictive check. RESULTS: Erythropoietin showed a diurnal baseline variation of +/-20%, described with a dual cosine model. Disposition was described with a two-compartment model with a small volume of distribution (6L) and parallel linear and nonlinear clearance. Total clearance varied between 0.3 and 0.9 L/h over the concentration range studied. A dual absorption model was used to characterise the rHuEPO absorption from the subcutaneous formulation and consisted of a faster pathway described as a sequential zero- and first-order absorption process and a parallel slower pathway characterised as a zero-order process. The bioavailability of subcutaneous rHuEPO increased from 30% at low doses to 71% at the highest dose of 160 kIU and was described using a hyperbolic model. The most important covariate effects were a decrease in the first-order absorption rate constant (k(a)) with increasing age, an increase in subcutaneous bioavailability with increasing baseline haemoglobin, and a decrease in bioavailability with increasing bodyweight. A posterior predictive check showed no systematic deviation of the simulated data from the observed values. CONCLUSION: The population pharmacokinetic model developed is suitable to describe the pharmacokinetic behaviour of rHuEPO after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in healthy subjects, over a wide dose range.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this analysis was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to describe the pharmacokinetics of recombinant humanerythropoietin (rHuEPO) in healthy subjects, after intravenous and subcutaneous administration over a wide dose range, and to examine the influence of demographic characteristics and other covariates on the pharmacokinetic parameters of rHuEPO. METHODS:Erythropoietin serum concentration data were available from 16 studies comprising 49 healthy subjects who received rHuEPO intravenous doses from 10 to 300 IU/kg, 427 healthy subjects who received rHuEPO subcutaneous doses from 1 to 2400 IU/kg, and 57 healthy subjects who received placebo and where endogenous erythropoietin concentrations were measured. Different pharmacokinetic models were fitted to the dataset using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling software (NONMEM, Version V, Level 1). Several patient covariates were tested in order to quantify the effect on rHuEPO pharmacokinetic parameters. Model evaluation was examined using a posterior predictive check. RESULTS:Erythropoietin showed a diurnal baseline variation of +/-20%, described with a dual cosine model. Disposition was described with a two-compartment model with a small volume of distribution (6L) and parallel linear and nonlinear clearance. Total clearance varied between 0.3 and 0.9 L/h over the concentration range studied. A dual absorption model was used to characterise the rHuEPO absorption from the subcutaneous formulation and consisted of a faster pathway described as a sequential zero- and first-order absorption process and a parallel slower pathway characterised as a zero-order process. The bioavailability of subcutaneous rHuEPO increased from 30% at low doses to 71% at the highest dose of 160 kIU and was described using a hyperbolic model. The most important covariate effects were a decrease in the first-order absorption rate constant (k(a)) with increasing age, an increase in subcutaneous bioavailability with increasing baseline haemoglobin, and a decrease in bioavailability with increasing bodyweight. A posterior predictive check showed no systematic deviation of the simulated data from the observed values. CONCLUSION: The population pharmacokinetic model developed is suitable to describe the pharmacokinetic behaviour of rHuEPO after intravenous and subcutaneous administration in healthy subjects, over a wide dose range.
Authors: K K Flaharty; J Caro; A Erslev; J J Whalen; E M Morris; T D Bjornsson; P H Vlasses Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 1990-05 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Rohini Ramakrishnan; Wing K Cheung; Mary C Wacholtz; Neil Minton; William J Jusko Journal: J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.126
Authors: J C Egrie; T W Strickland; J Lane; K Aoki; A M Cohen; R Smalling; G Trail; F K Lin; J K Browne; D K Hines Journal: Immunobiology Date: 1986-09 Impact factor: 3.144
Authors: Sunila Pradeep; Jie Huang; Edna M Mora; Alpa M Nick; Min Soon Cho; Sherry Y Wu; Kyunghee Noh; Chad V Pecot; Rajesha Rupaimoole; Martin A Stein; Stephan Brock; Yunfei Wen; Chiyi Xiong; Kshipra Gharpure; Jean M Hansen; Archana S Nagaraja; Rebecca A Previs; Pablo Vivas-Mejia; Hee Dong Han; Wei Hu; Lingegowda S Mangala; Behrouz Zand; Loren J Stagg; John E Ladbury; Bulent Ozpolat; S Neslihan Alpay; Masato Nishimura; Rebecca L Stone; Koji Matsuo; Guillermo N Armaiz-Peña; Heather J Dalton; Christopher Danes; Blake Goodman; Cristian Rodriguez-Aguayo; Carola Kruger; Armin Schneider; Shyon Haghpeykar; Padmavathi Jaladurgam; Mien-Chie Hung; Robert L Coleman; Jinsong Liu; Chun Li; Diana Urbauer; Gabriel Lopez-Berestein; David B Jackson; Anil K Sood Journal: Cancer Cell Date: 2015-10-17 Impact factor: 31.743
Authors: Sameer Doshi; Wojciech Krzyzanski; Susan Yue; Steven Elliott; Andrew Chow; Juan José Pérez-Ruixo Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: A Dubois; S Gsteiger; S Balser; E Pigeolet; J L Steimer; G Pillai; F Mentré Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2011-12-28 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Leonid Gibiansky; Liviawati Sutjandra; Sameer Doshi; Jenny Zheng; Winnie Sohn; Mark C Peterson; Graham R Jang; Andrew T Chow; Juan José Pérez-Ruixo Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 2012-04-01 Impact factor: 6.447