Literature DB >> 16801411

Use of probabilistic modeling within a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict sulfamethazine residue withdrawal times in edible tissues in swine.

Jennifer Buur1, Ronald Baynes, Geof Smith, Jim Riviere.   

Abstract

The presence of antimicrobial agents in edible tissues of food-producing animals remains a major public health concern. Probabilistic modeling techniques incorporated into a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model were used to predict the amounts of sulfamethazine residues in edible tissues in swine. A PBPK model for sulfamethazine in swine was adapted to include an oral dosing route. The distributions for sensitive parameters were determined and were used in a Monte Carlo analysis to predict tissue residue times. Validation of the distributions was done by comparison of the results of a Monte Carlo analysis to those obtained with an external data set from the literature and an in vivo pilot study. The model was used to predict the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval of the 99th percentile of the population, as recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The external data set was used to calculate the withdrawal time by using the tolerance limit algorithm designed by FDA. The withdrawal times obtained by both methods were compared to the labeled withdrawal time for the same dose. The Monte Carlo method predicted a withdrawal time of 21 days, based on the amounts of residues in the kidneys. The tolerance limit method applied to the time-limited data set predicted a withdrawal time of 12 days. The existing FDA label withdrawal time is 15 days. PBPK models can incorporate probabilistic modeling techniques that make them useful for prediction of tissue residue times. These models can be used to calculate the parameters required by FDA and explore those conditions where the established withdrawal time may not be sufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16801411      PMCID: PMC1489760          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01355-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  34 in total

1.  Physiological model for distribution of sulfathiazole in swine.

Authors:  J Duddy; T L Hayden; D W Bourne; W D Fiske; I H Benedek; D Stanley; A Gonzalez; W Heierman
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 2.  Sulfonamide hypersensitivity.

Authors:  Christopher G Slatore; Stephen A Tilles
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.479

3.  Pharmacokinetics of oral sulfa drugs and gastric emptying in the pig.

Authors:  E Kokue; M Shimoda; K Sakurada; J Wada
Journal:  J Pharmacobiodyn       Date:  1988-08

4.  Evidence for diazotization of 14C-sulfamethazine [4-amino-N-(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)benzene[U-14C]sulfonamide] in swine. The effect of nitrite.

Authors:  G D Paulson; V J Feil
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.922

5.  Pharmacokinetics and renal clearance of sulphadimidine, sulphamerazine and sulphadiazine and their N4-acetyl and hydroxy metabolites in pigs.

Authors:  J F Nouws; D Mevius; T B Vree; M Degen
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.320

6.  I. A unique deaminated metabolite of sulfamethazine [4-amino-N-(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl) benzenesulfonamide] in swine.

Authors:  G Paulson; G Struble
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1980-11-17       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  Application of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for reference dose and reference concentration estimation for acetone.

Authors:  P Robinan Gentry; Tammie R Covington; Harvey J Clewell; Melvin E Anderson
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2003-12-12

8.  Pharmacokinetics, renal clearance, tissue distribution, and residue aspects of sulphadimidine and its N4-acetyl metabolite in pigs.

Authors:  J F Nouws; T B Vree; M Baakman; F Driessens; L Vellenga; D J Mevius
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 3.320

9.  Steady state kinetics of 14C-sulfamethazine [4-amino-N-(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)benzene[U-14C]sulfonamide] metabolism in swine.

Authors:  A D Mitchell; G D Paulson; R G Zaylskie
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.922

10.  Depletion kinetics of 14C-sulfamethazine [4-amino-N-(4, 6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidinyl)benzene[U-14C]sulfonamide] metabolism in swine.

Authors:  A D Mitchell; G D Paulson
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  1986 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.922

View more
  6 in total

1.  Simulating pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic fuzzy-parameterized models: a comparison of numerical methods.

Authors:  Kok-Yong Seng; Ivan Nestorov; Paolo Vicini
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  Prevalence of antimicrobial residues in pork meat in Madagascar.

Authors:  Michel Rakotoharinome; Damien Pognon; Tantely Randriamparany; Jimmy Chane Ming; Jean-Patrick Idoumbin; Eric Cardinale; Vincent Porphyre
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2013-07-13       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Interspecies mixed-effect pharmacokinetic modeling of penicillin G in cattle and swine.

Authors:  Mengjie Li; Ronette Gehring; Lisa Tell; Ronald Baynes; Qingbiao Huang; Jim E Riviere
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Physiological parameter values for physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in food-producing animals. Part I: Cattle and swine.

Authors:  Zhoumeng Lin; Miao Li; Yu-Shin Wang; Lisa A Tell; Ronald E Baynes; Jennifer L Davis; Thomas W Vickroy; Jim E Riviere
Journal:  J Vet Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 1.786

5.  In vivo therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetics of colistin sulfate in an experimental model of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli infection in weaned pigs.

Authors:  Mohamed Rhouma; Francis Beaudry; William Thériault; Nadia Bergeron; Guy Beauchamp; Sylvette Laurent-Lewandowski; John Morris Fairbrother; Ann Letellier
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.683

6.  Human Food Safety Implications of Variation in Food Animal Drug Metabolism.

Authors:  Zhoumeng Lin; Christopher I Vahl; Jim E Riviere
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.