Literature DB >> 15612850

Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students.

Kim Fromme1, William Corbin.   

Abstract

The Lifestyle Management Class (LMC) was evaluated as a universal and targeted alcohol prevention program among voluntary and mandated college students. The relative efficacy of peer- and professional-led group interventions was also tested in this randomized, controlled design. LMC participants showed decreases in driving after drinking relative to control participants. Changes in heavy drinking varied as a function of treatment condition, readiness to change, and gender, with a trend toward larger decreases among voluntary LMC participants high in readiness to change and a comparable though nonsignificant advantage for male LMC participants in the mandated sample. The LMC was comparably effective for mandated and voluntary students, with no clear advantage for peer- or professional-led groups. Copyright 2004 APA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15612850     DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol        ISSN: 0022-006X


  91 in total

1.  Alcohol-related infractions among college students: associations with subsequent drinking as a function of sensitivity to punishment.

Authors:  Tyler B Wray; Jeffrey S Simons; Robert D Dvorak
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2011-06

2.  Brief motivational interventions for college student drinking may not be as powerful as we think: an individual participant-level data meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Huh; Eun-Young Mun; Mary E Larimer; Helene R White; Anne E Ray; Isaac C Rhew; Su-Young Kim; Yang Jiao; David C Atkins
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  A brief marijuana intervention for non-treatment-seeking young adult women.

Authors:  Michael D Stein; Claire E Hagerty; Debra S Herman; Maureen G Phipps; Bradley J Anderson
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-12-24

4.  Two brief alcohol interventions for mandated college students.

Authors:  Brian Borsari; Kate B Carey
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2005-09

Review 5.  Individual and situational factors that influence the efficacy of personalized feedback substance use interventions for mandated college students.

Authors:  Eun Young Mun; Helene R White; Thomas J Morgan
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

6.  Computer versus in-person intervention for students violating campus alcohol policy.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; James M Henson; Michael P Carey; Stephen A Maisto
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02

7.  A developmental-based motivational intervention to reduce alcohol and marijuana use among non-treatment-seeking young adults: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael D Stein; Celeste M Caviness; Emily F Morse; Kristin R Grimone; Daniel Audet; Debra S Herman; Ethan Moitra; Bradley J Anderson
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 6.526

8.  Alcohol interventions for mandated students: behavioral outcomes from a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Diane E Logan; Jason R Kilmer; Kevin M King; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Change talk and relatedness in group motivational interviewing: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ryan C Shorey; Steve Martino; Kayla E Lamb; Steven D LaRowe; Elizabeth J Santa Ana
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2014-11-20

Review 10.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of peer-based interventions on health-related behaviors in adults.

Authors:  Allison R Webel; Jennifer Okonsky; Joyce Trompeta; William L Holzemer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.