PURPOSE: To evaluate a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-fluoroscopy fusion-based intraoperative dosimetry system. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five patients were treated for prostate cancer with Pd-103 implantation. After the execution of the treatment plan, two sets of TRUS images were collected using the longitudinal and axial transducers of a biplanar probe. Then, three fluoroscopic images were acquired at 0, -15 and +15 degrees . The three-dimensional locations of all implanted seeds were reconstructed from fluoroscopic images. A subset of the implanted seeds was manually identified in TRUS images and used as fiducial markers to perform TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion. To improve the implant quality, additional seeds were placed if adverse isodose patterns were identified during visual inspection. If additional seeds were placed, intraoperative dosimetry was repeated. Day 0 computed tomography-based dosimetry was compared with final intraoperative dosimetry to validate dosimetry achieved in the implant suite. RESULTS: An average of additional 4.0 seeds was implanted in 16 patients after initial intraoperative dose evaluation. Based on TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion-based dosimetry, the V100 improved from 86% to 93% (p = 0.005), whereas D90 increased from 94% to 109% (p = 0.011) with the guided additional seed implantation. No statistical difference was observed in V200 and V300 values. V100 and D90 values were 95 +/- 4% and 120 +/- 24%, respectively, based on the final intraoperative dosimetry evaluation, compared with 95 +/- 4% and 122 +/- 24%, respectively, based on Day 0 computed tomography-based dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of extra seeds based on TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion-based intraoperative dosimetry can improve the final V100 and D90 values with minimal increase in V200 and V300 values.
PURPOSE: To evaluate a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-fluoroscopy fusion-based intraoperative dosimetry system. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five patients were treated for prostate cancer with Pd-103 implantation. After the execution of the treatment plan, two sets of TRUS images were collected using the longitudinal and axial transducers of a biplanar probe. Then, three fluoroscopic images were acquired at 0, -15 and +15 degrees . The three-dimensional locations of all implanted seeds were reconstructed from fluoroscopic images. A subset of the implanted seeds was manually identified in TRUS images and used as fiducial markers to perform TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion. To improve the implant quality, additional seeds were placed if adverse isodose patterns were identified during visual inspection. If additional seeds were placed, intraoperative dosimetry was repeated. Day 0 computed tomography-based dosimetry was compared with final intraoperative dosimetry to validate dosimetry achieved in the implant suite. RESULTS: An average of additional 4.0 seeds was implanted in 16 patients after initial intraoperative dose evaluation. Based on TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion-based dosimetry, the V100 improved from 86% to 93% (p = 0.005), whereas D90 increased from 94% to 109% (p = 0.011) with the guided additional seed implantation. No statistical difference was observed in V200 and V300 values. V100 and D90 values were 95 +/- 4% and 120 +/- 24%, respectively, based on the final intraoperative dosimetry evaluation, compared with 95 +/- 4% and 122 +/- 24%, respectively, based on Day 0 computed tomography-based dosimetry. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of extra seeds based on TRUS-fluoroscopy fusion-based intraoperative dosimetry can improve the final V100 and D90 values with minimal increase in V200 and V300 values.
Authors: Ehsan Dehghan; Mehdi Moradi; Xu Wen; Danny French; Julio Lobo; W James Morris; Septimiu E Salcudean; Gabor Fichtinger Journal: Med Phys Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Junghoon Lee; Christian Labat; Ameet K Jain; Danny Y Song; Everette Clif Burdette; Gabor Fichtinger; Jerry L Prince Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2010-07-19 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Nicholas G Zaorsky; Brian J Davis; Paul L Nguyen; Timothy N Showalter; Peter J Hoskin; Yasuo Yoshioka; Gerard C Morton; Eric M Horwitz Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2017-06-30 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: A Jain; A Deguet; I Iordachita; G Chintalapani; S Vikal; J Blevins; Y Le; E Armour; C Burdette; D Song; G Fichtinger Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2010-08-14 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Ehsan Dehghan; Junghoon Lee; Pascal Fallavollita; Nathanael Kuo; Anton Deguet; Yi Le; E Clif Burdette; Danny Y Song; Jerry L Prince; Gabor Fichtinger Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2012-06-16 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: Junghoon Lee; Omar Y Mian; Yi Le; Hee Joon Bae; E Clif Burdette; Theodore L DeWeese; Jerry L Prince; Daniel Y Song Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 6.280