Literature DB >> 17706432

Signal and noise characteristics of SSFP FMRI: a comparison with GRE at multiple field strengths.

Karla L Miller1, Stephen M Smith, Peter Jezzard, Graham C Wiggins, Christopher J Wiggins.   

Abstract

Recent work has proposed the use of steady-state free precession (SSFP) as an alternative to the conventional methods for obtaining functional MRI (FMRI) data. The contrast mechanism in SSFP is likely to be related to conventional FMRI signals, but the details of the signal changes may differ in important ways. Functional contrast in SSFP has been proposed to result from several different mechanisms, which are likely to contribute in varying degrees depending on the specific parameters used in the experiment. In particular, the signal dynamics are likely to differ depending on whether the sequence is configured to scan in the SSFP transition band or passband. This work describes experiments that explore the source of SSFP FMRI signal changes by comparing SSFP data to conventional gradient-recalled echo (GRE) data. Data were acquired at a range of magnetic field strengths and repetition times, for both transition band and passband methods. The signal properties of SSFP and GRE differ significantly, confirming a different source of functional contrast in SSFP. In addition, the temporal noise properties are significantly different, with important implications for SSFP FMRI sequence optimisation.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17706432     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.06.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  18 in total

1.  Neuroscience may supersede ethics and law.

Authors:  Thomas R Scott
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Full-brain coverage and high-resolution imaging capabilities of passband b-SSFP fMRI at 3T.

Authors:  Jin Hyung Lee; Serge O Dumoulin; Emine U Saritas; Gary H Glover; Brian A Wandell; Dwight G Nishimura; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Fat-suppressed alternating-SSFP for whole-brain fMRI using breath-hold and visual stimulus paradigms.

Authors:  Tiffany Jou; Steve Patterson; John M Pauly; Chris V Bowen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of high-resolution balanced steady-state free precession fMRI at high field of 9.4T.

Authors:  Sung-Hong Park; Tae Kim; Ping Wang; Seong-Gi Kim
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Integrated SSFP for functional brain mapping at 7T with reduced susceptibility artifact.

Authors:  Kaibao Sun; Rong Xue; Peng Zhang; Zhentao Zuo; Zhongwei Chen; Bo Wang; Thomas Martin; Yi Wang; Lin Chen; Sheng He; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Steady-state functional MRI using spoiled small-tip fast recovery imaging.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Jeffrey A Fessler; Douglas C Noll; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-03-11       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Data-driven optimization and evaluation of 2D EPI and 3D PRESTO for BOLD fMRI at 7 Tesla: I. Focal coverage.

Authors:  Robert L Barry; Stephen C Strother; J Christopher Gatenby; John C Gore
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Layer-specific functional and anatomical MRI of the retina with passband balanced SSFP.

Authors:  Eric R Muir; Timothy Q Duong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-05-20       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Anatomical, blood oxygenation level-dependent, and blood flow MRI of nonhuman primate (baboon) retina.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Hsiao-Ying Wey; Oscar San Emeterio Nateras; Qi Peng; Bryan H De La Garza; Timothy Q Duong
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  T2-weighted 3D fMRI using S2-SSFP at 7 tesla.

Authors:  Markus Barth; Heiko Meyer; Stephan A R Kannengiesser; Jonathan R Polimeni; Lawrence L Wald; David G Norris
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.