Literature DB >> 17705076

Clinical outcome of the laparoscopic surgery for stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Takeshi Naitoh1, Takashi Tsuchiya, Hiroshi Honda, Masaya Oikawa, Yuko Saito, Yasuhiro Hasegawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery has become widely accepted recently. However, the oncological validity of this surgery has not yet been well analyzed, especially for advanced cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the clinical outcome of laparoscopic surgery for stage II/III colorectal cancer in our hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 1999 and August 2006, 321 patients underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in our hospital; of those 121 cases whose pathological findings revealed stage II/III were included in this study. Among these cases, we assessed a short-term outcome and a medium-term outcome in terms of survival evaluation.
RESULTS: The male:female ratio was 73:48, and mean age of patients was 62.4 years. Thirteen tumors were located in the cecum, 29 in the ascending colon, five in the transverse colon, one in the descending colon, 43 in the sigmoid colon, and 30 in the rectum. Average duration of operation was 184 minutes, and mean estimated blood loss was 53.5 ml. Five patients (4.1%) were converted to open procedures. No intraoperative complication was observed but eight complications (6.6%) occurred postoperatively. Forty-two cases were classified as stage II, 62 as stage IIIA /B, and 17 as stage IIIC. Five patients died of cancer relapse (4.1%), and 18 cases had recurrence of disease (14.9%), to date. No port-site recurrence was detected. Overall five-year survival was 95.7% in stage II, 84.1% in stage IIIA/B, 70.0% in stage IIIC. Meanwhile disease-free five-year survival was 75.6% in stage II, 80.1% in stage IIIA/B, and 66.8% in stage IIIC. No significant difference was observed between stages, in terms of either overall or disease-free survival.
CONCLUSION: Although further evaluation is required, laparoscopic surgery for stage II/III colorectal cancer is safe and would be an oncologically adequate procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17705076     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-007-9528-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  12 in total

1.  Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  H Hasegawa; Y Kabeshima; M Watanabe; S Yamamoto; M Kitajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

Review 3.  Abdominal wall metastasis and peritoneal carcinomatosis after laparoscopic-assisted colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  P Jacquet; A M Averbach; N Jacquet
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Five-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancer.

Authors:  D Lechaux; G Trebuchet; J L Le Calve
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Port site metastases after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cure of malignancy.

Authors:  S D Wexner; S M Cohen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report.

Authors:  J W Milsom; B Böhm; K A Hammerhofer; V Fazio; E Steiger; P Elson
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.113

10.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  C B Sample; M Watson; A Okrainec; R Gupta; D Birch; M Anvari
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  4 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes following laparoscopic resection for colon cancer.

Authors:  Dara O Kavanagh; David Gibson; Diarmaid C Moran; Myles Smith; Kate O Donnell; Emmanuel Eguare; Frank B V Keane; Diarmaid S O Riordain; Paul C Neary
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Long-term results of laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection: current knowledge and what remains unclear.

Authors:  Kok-Yang Tan; Fumio Konishi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Gabriele Anania; Mirco Santini; Lucia Scagliarini; Alice Marzetti; Laura Vedana; Serafino Marino; Claudio Gregorio; Giuseppe Resta; Giorgio Cavallesco
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Potential value of sonazoid-enhanced intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography for liver assessment during laparoscopy-assisted colectomy.

Authors:  Tetsuya Itabashi; Akira Sasaki; Koki Otsuka; Toshimoto Kimura; Hiroyuki Nitta; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 2.549

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.