Literature DB >> 22876039

A totally mini-invasive approach for colorectal laparoscopic surgery.

Gabriele Anania1, Mirco Santini, Lucia Scagliarini, Alice Marzetti, Laura Vedana, Serafino Marino, Claudio Gregorio, Giuseppe Resta, Giorgio Cavallesco.   

Abstract

AIM: To study the short-term outcome of patients treated with laparoscopic right colectomy and how intracorporeal anastomosis has improved the outcome.
METHODS: We retrospectively examined all patients affected by colorectal cancer who underwent a laparoscopic right colectomy between January 2006 and December 2010 in our department. Our evaluation criteria were: diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma at presurgical biopsy, elective surgery, and the same surgeon. We excluded: emergency surgery, conversions from laparotomic colectomy, and other surgeons. The endpoints we examined were: surgical time, number of lymph nodes removed, length of stay (removal of nasogastric tube, bowel movements, gas evacuation, solid and liquid feeding, hospitalization), and major complications. Seventy-two patients were divided into two groups: intracorporeal anastomosis (39 patients) and extracorporeal anastomosis (33 patients).
RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between intracorporeal vs extracorporeal anastomosis, respectively, for surgical times (186.8 min vs 184.1 min, P < 0.001), time to resumption of gas evacuation (3 d vs 3.5 d, P < 0.001), days until resumption of bowel movements (3.8 d vs 4.9 d, P < 0.001), days until resumption of liquid diet (3.5 d vs 4.5 d, P < 0.001), days until resuming a solid diet (4.6 d vs 5.7 d, P < 0.001), and total hospitalization duration (7.4 d vs 8.5 d, P < 0.001). In the intracorporeal group, on average, 19 positive lymph nodes were removed; in the extracorporeal group, on average, 14 were removed P < 0.001). Thus, intracorporeal anastomosis for right laparoscopic colectomy improved patient outcome by providing faster recovery of nutrition, faster recovery of intestinal function, and shorter hospitalization than extracorporeal anastomosis.
CONCLUSION: Short-term outcomes favor intracorporeal anastomosis, confirming that a less traumatic surgical approach improves patient outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomosis; Cancer; Colorectal disease; Laparoscopy; Surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22876039      PMCID: PMC3413059          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i29.3869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  24 in total

1.  COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.588

2.  [A case-control study of extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis in patients subjected to right laparoscopic hemicolectomy].

Authors:  Jorge Arredondo Chaves; Carlos Pastor Idoate; Jorge Baixauli Fons; Manuel Bellver Oliver; Nicolás Pedano Rodríguez; Alvaro Bueno Delgado; José Luis Hernández Lizoain
Journal:  Cir Esp       Date:  2010-12-19       Impact factor: 1.653

3.  Comparison of short- and medium-term results between laparoscopically assisted and totally laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Massimiliano Fabozzi; Rosaldo Allieta; Riccardo Brachet Contul; Manuela Grivon; Paolo Millo; Elena Lale-Murix; Mario Nardi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy for cancer: a case-control study.

Authors:  Marco Scatizzi; Katrin C Kröning; Andrea Borrelli; Gordon Andan; Elisa Lenzi; Francesco Feroci
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Anthony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Karen M Brady; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Laparoscopic vs open hemicolectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  E Lezoche; F Feliciotti; A M Paganini; M Guerrieri; A De Sanctis; S Minervini; R Campagnacci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-01-09       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Experience as a factor influencing the indications for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and the results.

Authors:  F Marusch; I Gastinger; C Schneider; H Scheidbach; J Konradt; H P Bruch; L Köhler; E Bärlehner; F Köckerling
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Standardized laparoscopic intracorporeal right colectomy for cancer: short-term outcome in 111 unselected patients.

Authors:  Roberto Bergamaschi; Elie Schochet; Christopher Haughn; Marshall Burke; James F Reed; Jean-Pierre Arnaud
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Clinical outcome of the laparoscopic surgery for stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Naitoh; Takashi Tsuchiya; Hiroshi Honda; Masaya Oikawa; Yuko Saito; Yasuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal anastomosis for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Minia Hellan; Casandra Anderson; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more
  15 in total

1.  Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastamosis: a comparison of short-term outcomes.

Authors:  Ashley S Vergis; Sarah N Steigerwald; Faizal D Bhojani; Paul A Sullivan; Krista M Hardy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

2.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in right hemicolectomy assisted by laparoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  J Bollo; P Salas; M C Martinez; P Hernandez; A Rabal; E Carrillo; E Targarona
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Stefano Trastulli; Andrea Coratti; Salvatore Guarino; Riccardo Piagnerelli; Mario Annecchiarico; Francesco Coratti; Michele Di Marino; Francesco Ricci; Jacopo Desiderio; Roberto Cirocchi; Amilcare Parisi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic left colectomy for splenic flexure cancer: results from a multi-institutional audit on 181 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Pierluigi Angelini; Giovanna Berardi; Morena Burati; Francesco Corcione; Paolo Delrio; Ugo Elmore; Maria Lemma; Michele Manigrasso; Alfredo Mellano; Andrea Muratore; Ugo Pace; Daniela Rega; Riccardo Rosati; Ernesto Tartaglia; Giovanni Domenico De Palma
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in minimally invasive right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S H Emile; H Elfeki; M Shalaby; A Sakr; M Bassuni; P Christensen; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 6.  Recovery after intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Milone; Ugo Elmore; Andrea Vignali; Nicola Gennarelli; Michele Manigrasso; Morena Burati; Francesco Milone; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Paolo Delrio; Riccardo Rosati
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  A critical and comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Authors:  Claudio Ricci; Riccardo Casadei; Vincenzo Alagna; Elia Zani; Giovanni Taffurelli; Carlo Alberto Pacilio; Francesco Minni
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Incidence trends and predictors for cost and average lengths of stay in colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Daw-Shyong Perng; I-Cheng Lu; Hon-Yi Shi; Chih-Wen Lin; Kuang-Wen Liu; Ya-Fen Su; King-Teh Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic-assisted left colectomy for cancer: a retrospective review.

Authors:  Forat Swaid; Gideon Sroka; Hussam Madi; Dan Shteinberg; Mustafa Somri; Ibrahim Matter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach.

Authors:  Emanuele Rausa; Michael Eamon Kelly; Emanuele Asti; Alberto Aiolfi; Gianluca Bonitta; Luigi Bonavina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.