Literature DB >> 12140622

Five-year results of 206 laparoscopic left colectomies for cancer.

D Lechaux1, G Trebuchet, J L Le Calve.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year survival of 206 consecutive patients with left colon carcinoma operated with a laparoscopic procedure between March 1992 and December 2000.
METHODS: Patients with obstructing or bulky cancers were excluded from this study. Tumor stage was defined according to the Dukes modified classification. The laparoscopic-assisted technique included primary high vascular ligation, centrifugal dissection of the mesentery, and "no touch" technique. The survival rates were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier test.
RESULTS: There were 109 males and 97 females, median age 67 (range 34-91). There were 30 left hemicolectomies (15%) and 177 sigmoid colectomies (85%). 22 patients required open conversion (11%). Overall operative mortality (1 month) was 1% and morbidity 12% (surgical and medical). There were 56 Dukes A carcinomas (27%), 69 Dukes B (34%), 54 Dukes C (26%), and 27 Dukes D (13%). 125 patients (61%) are alive and disease free, 22 (11%) are alive with disease recurrence, and 59 patients (28%) are deceased. None have been lost to follow-up. Only 1 case of trocar site implantation occurred after curative resections. Three-year observed survival rate were 93% for Dukes A + B (node negative tumors confined to the bowel wall), 78% for Dukes C, and 15% for Dukes D. The 5-year survival rates were 85% for Dukes A + B, 61% for Dukes C, and 8% for Dukes D.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer seems to be a safe procedure. The long-term results are comparable to those of open surgery. Further randomized trials will be necessary to confirm the value of this technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12140622     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9011-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  8 in total

Review 1.  What is a meant when a laparoscopic surgical procedure is described as "safe"?

Authors:  D Weizman; J Cyriac; D R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoscopic extended right colectomy versus laparoscopic left colectomy for carcinoma of the splenic flexure: a matched case-control study.

Authors:  Nicola de'Angelis; Elisabeth Hain; Mara Disabato; Cristiana Cordun; Maria Clotilde Carra; Daniel Azoulay; Francesco Brunetti
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon adenocarcinoma: an 11-year retrospective review with 5-year survival rates.

Authors:  B P Jacob; B Salky
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-28       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  James Yoo
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2008

5.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: comparable to conventional oncologic surgery?

Authors:  Ricardo M Bonnor; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08

6.  Clinical outcome of the laparoscopic surgery for stage II and III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Naitoh; Takashi Tsuchiya; Hiroshi Honda; Masaya Oikawa; Yuko Saito; Yasuhiro Hasegawa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Evaluations of laparoscopic proctocolectomy versus traditional technique in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Spyridon G Koulas; George Pappas-Gogos; Spyridon Spirou; Evangelos Roustanis; Konstantinos E Tsimogiannis; Georgios Tsirves; Evangelos C Tsimoyiannis
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2009 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

8.  Randomized trial of health-related quality of life after open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Martin Janson; Elisabet Lindholm; Bo Anderberg; Eva Haglind
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.453

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.