Literature DB >> 12574925

Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer.

H Hasegawa1, Y Kabeshima, M Watanabe, S Yamamoto, M Kitajima.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After confirming a favorable outcome of laparoscopic surgery for early colorectal cancer, we conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer.
METHODS: Fifty-nine patients with T2 or T3 colorectal cancer were randomized to undergo laparoscopic (n = 29) or open (n = 30) colectomy. Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 6-34 months).
RESULTS: Operative time was longer (p <0.0001) and blood loss (p = 0.0034) and postoperative analgesic requirement were less in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. An earlier return of bowel motility and earlier discharge from the hospital (p = 0.0164) were observed after laparoscopic surgery. Serum C-reactive protein levels on postoperative days 1 (p <0.0001) and 4 (p = 0.0039) were lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group. Postoperative complications did not differ between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic surgery for advanced colorectal cancer is feasible, with favorable short-term outcome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12574925     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-8516-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  65 in total

1.  Short-term outcomes following reduced-port, single-port, and multi-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: tailored laparoscopic approaches based on tumor size and nodal status.

Authors:  Hyeon Yu; Jin Yong Shin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Robotic left colon cancer resection: a dual docking technique that maximizes splenic flexure mobilization.

Authors:  Sung Uk Bae; Se Jin Baek; Hyuk Hur; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Byung Soh Min
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of immunologic outcomes of laparoscopic vs open approaches in clinical stage III colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang-Ah Han; Woo Yong Lee; Chi-Min Park; Seong Hyeon Yun; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Laparoscopic palliative surgery for complicated colorectal cancer.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; C D Smith; E M Ritter; E Mason; T Duncan; B J Ramshaw
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A comparison of the complication rates between laparoscopic colectomy and laparoscopic low anterior resection.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Fujita; T Akasu; Y Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic colorectal surgery: learning curve and training implications.

Authors:  P R Shah; A Joseph; P N Haray
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Reduction of prolonged postoperative hospital stay after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  S Yamamoto; S Fujita; T Akasu; K Uehara; Y Moriya
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer on operative outcomes and survival.

Authors:  Wai Lun Law; Yee Man Lee; Hok Kwok Choi; Chi Leung Seto; Judy Wc Ho
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Laparoscopic resection for colorectal diseases: short-term outcomes of a single center.

Authors:  Wafi Attaallah; Hayyam Babayev; Samet Yardımcı; Asım Cingi; Mustafa Ümit Uğurlu; Ömer Günal
Journal:  Ulus Cerrahi Derg       Date:  2016-04-06

10.  Laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: comparable to conventional oncologic surgery?

Authors:  Ricardo M Bonnor; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2005-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.