Literature DB >> 17704315

A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT.

E L Nickoloff1, P O Alderson.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to measure radiation doses for 64-slice cardiac CT angiography studies and to study the dose-savings features of these CT scanners. This was done using various phantoms. These radiation doses were compared with those from typical helical body CT scans, fluoroscopy cardiac catheterization studies and mammography examinations. Radiation measurements were made with a CT ionization detector and a solid state dosimeter. A GE 64-slice Lightspeed VCT and a Siemens Somatom Sensation 64 CT were used to scan a standard 32 cm acrylic phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom. Data were collected in axial and various gated cardiac helical modes. Organ doses and the effective doses were calculated from the measurements. In gated CT cardiac mode with the 32 cm acrylic phantom, the measured radiation doses per study were generally three to seven times greater than those from typical body helical CT examinations; the range depended upon selectable scan parameters. With the anatomical phantom, the surface doses in the anteroposterior (AP) plane were typically 20-60% higher than those measured using the 32 cm phantom. The lateral surface doses were -4% to +15%. These results can be attributed to the shorter AP dimension and the air in the lungs. The CT skin entrance radiation doses were 80-90% less than diagnostic cardiac catheterization studies, and organ doses were similar. Because 64-slice cardiac gated CT uses pitches equal to 0.20-0.27 and high mAs values, the patient radiation doses are appreciably higher than in routine body CT examinations. The female breast, which could receive a radiation dose 10-30 times that received from mammography screening, is an organ of particular concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17704315     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/34603706

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  9 in total

1.  Quantification of radiation dose savings in cardiac computed tomography using prospectively triggered mode and ECG pulsing: a phantom study.

Authors:  Lukas Lehmkuhl; Dieter Gosch; H D Nagel; Patrick Stumpp; Thomas Kahn; Matthias Gutberlet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Examination of the optimal temporal resolution required for computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Kazuya Ohashi; Katsuhiro Ichikawa; Masaki Hara; Tatsuya Kawai; Hiroshi Kunitomo; Ryo Higashide; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-05-26

3.  Prospects for advancing nuclear cardiology by means of new detector designs.

Authors:  Kenneth J Nichols; Andrew Van Tosh; Christopher J Palestro
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Radiation dose and cancer risk in retrospectively and prospectively ECG-gated coronary angiography using 64-slice multidetector CT.

Authors:  B Huang; J Li; M W-M Law; J Zhang; Y Shen; P L Khong
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography for evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft patency: comparison of image quality, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Jae Hwan Lee; Eun Ju Chun; Sang Il Choi; Mani Vembar; Cheong Lim; Kay-Hyun Park; Dong-Ju Choi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  What is the Value of CT Angiography for Patients with Acute Chest Pain?

Authors:  Hector M Medina; Carlos A Rojas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-01

7.  [Coronary heart-CT].

Authors:  N Faucheron; P Reimer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Multimodality imaging in the evaluation of cardiovascular manifestations of malignancy.

Authors:  Laura Jiménez-Juan; Jessica Leen; Rachel M Wald; Elsie T Nguyen; Andrew T Yan; Anish Kirpalani; Bernd J Wintersperger; Andrew M Crean
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2011-03-27       Impact factor: 1.866

9.  Low radiation dose imaging of myocardial perfusion and coronary angiography with a hybrid PET/CT scanner.

Authors:  S Kajander; H Ukkonen; H Sipilä; M Teräs; J Knuuti
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.273

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.