Literature DB >> 17701364

Epidemiology of osteoporosis related fractures in Hungary from the nationwide health insurance database, 1999-2003.

M Péntek1, C Horváth, I Boncz, Z Falusi, E Tóth, A Sebestyén, I Májer, V Brodszky, L Gulácsi.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The Hungarian national health insurance database was screened for fractures of patients aged 50-100, 1999-2003. On average, there were 343 hip, 1,579 forearm, 342 proximal humerus, 48 inpatient vertebral and 2,459 other fractures/100,000 inhabitants/year.
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of fractures differs among populations. Our aim was to study the incidence of fractures in Hungary, focusing on classical osteoporotic sites and to compare the results with those of other European countries.
METHODS: The Hungarian National Health Insurance Fund database, covering 100% of the population, was screened for fractures of patients aged 50-100, 1999-2003. The search of vertebral fractures was restricted to those admitted to hospital. A gender and age-matched comparison was performed with available data from Europe.
RESULTS: There were mean 343 hip, 1,579 forearm, 342 proximal humerus, 48 inpatient vertebral and 2,459 other fractures/100,000 inhabitants/year; the female/male ratio was between 1.2-2.4. Multiple fractures occurred in 23.1% of the cases. Hip fracture incidence in Hungary lies between the rates of northern and southern countries of Europe.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers nationwide epidemiological data on fractures in Hungary. The incidence of fractures increased by age, regardless of the type of fracture. Incidence of hip fractures in Hungary fits in the previously established geographic trends in Europe. Our results fulfil a need for fracture data from Central Europe.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701364     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-007-0453-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  31 in total

1.  Taiwan's new national health insurance program: genesis and experience so far.

Authors:  Tsung-Mei Cheng
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds.

Authors:  J A Kanis; A Oden; O Johnell; B Jonsson; C de Laet; A Dawson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Update in the epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Mika Palvanen; Pekka Kannus; Seppo Niemi; Jari Parkkari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  International variation in the incidence of hip fractures: cross-national project on osteoporosis for the World Health Organization Program for Research on Aging.

Authors:  A V Schwartz; J L Kelsey; S Maggi; M Tuttleman; S C Ho; P V Jónsson; G Poór; J A Sisson de Castro; L Xu; C C Matkin; L M Nelson; S P Heyse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  The hospital burden of vertebral fracture in Europe: a study of national register sources.

Authors:  O Johnell; B Gullberg; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Estimated prevalence of osteoporosis from a Nationwide Health Insurance database in Taiwan.

Authors:  Nan-Ping Yang; Chung-Yeh Deng; Yiing-Jenq Chou; Po-Quang Chen; Ching-Heng Lin; Pesus Chou; Hong-Jen Chang
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2005-06-08       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Determinants of incident vertebral fracture in men and women: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS).

Authors:  D K Roy; T W O'Neill; J D Finn; M Lunt; A J Silman; D Felsenberg; G Armbrecht; D Banzer; L I Benevolenskaya; A Bhalla; J Bruges Armas; J B Cannata; C Cooper; J Dequeker; M N Diaz; R Eastell; O B Yershova; B Felsch; W Gowin; S Havelka; K Hoszowski; A A Ismail; I Jajic; I Janott; O Johnell; J A Kanis; G Kragl; A Lopez Vaz; R Lorenc; G Lyritis; P Masaryk; C Matthis; T Miazgowski; C Gennari; H A P Pols; G Poor; H H Raspe; D M Reid; W Reisinger; C Scheidt-Nave; J J Stepan; C J Todd; K Weber; A D Woolf; J Reeve
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study.

Authors:  T W O'Neill; W Cockerill; C Matthis; H H Raspe; M Lunt; C Cooper; D Banzer; J B Cannata; M Naves; B Felsch; D Felsenberg; J Janott; O Johnell; J A Kanis; G Kragl; A Lopes Vaz; G Lyritis; P Masaryk; G Poor; D M Reid; W Reisinger; C Scheidt-Nave; J J Stepan; C J Todd; A D Woolf; J Reeve; A J Silman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-12       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  International variations in hip fracture probabilities: implications for risk assessment.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Olof Johnell; Chris De Laet; Bengt Jonsson; Anders Oden; Alan K Ogelsby
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  High incidence rate of hip fracture in Taiwan: estimated from a nationwide health insurance database.

Authors:  W C Chie; R S Yang; J P Liu; K S Tsai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-20       Impact factor: 4.507

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  [Fractures of the humerus head].

Authors:  M Jaeger; K Izadpanah; D Maier; K Reising; P C Strohm; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Jane A Cauley; Didier Chalhoub; Ahmed M Kassem; Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  HTA in Central and Eastern European countries; the 2001: A Space Odyssey and efficiency gain.

Authors:  L Gulácsi; M Péntek
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-09

4.  The Axillary View Typically Does Not Contribute to Decision Making in Care for Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Authors:  Marschall B Berkes; Joshua S Dines; Jacqueline F Birnbaum; Lionel E Lazaro; Tristan C Lorich; Milton T M Little; Joseph T Nguyen; Dean G Lorich
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2015-06-09

Review 5.  Osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review of U.S. healthcare costs and resource utilization.

Authors:  Sangeeta Budhia; Yeshi Mikyas; Michael Tang; Enkhe Badamgarav
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 6.  [Posttraumatic nonunions and malunions of the proximal humerus. Possibilities and limitations of corrective osteotomy].

Authors:  R Meller; N Hawi; U Schmiddem; P J Millett; M Petri; C Krettek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  The incidence of hip fractures in Estonia, 2005-2012.

Authors:  M Jürisson; S Vorobjov; R Kallikorm; M Lember; A Uusküla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Increasing age- and sex-specific rates of hip fracture in Mexico: a survey of the Mexican Institute of Social Security.

Authors:  H Johansson; P Clark; F Carlos; A Oden; E V McCloskey; J A Kanis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  [Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae].

Authors:  C Gwinner; S Greiner; C Gerhardt; M Scheibel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 10.  The treatment of proximal humeral fracture in adults.

Authors:  Klaus J Burkhart; Sven O Dietz; Leonard Bastian; Ulrich Thelen; Reinhard Hoffmann; Lars P Müller
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.