Literature DB >> 26981052

The Axillary View Typically Does Not Contribute to Decision Making in Care for Proximal Humeral Fractures.

Marschall B Berkes1, Joshua S Dines2, Jacqueline F Birnbaum2, Lionel E Lazaro2, Tristan C Lorich2, Milton T M Little2, Joseph T Nguyen2, Dean G Lorich2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Convention dictates that an axillary view be obtained when evaluating proximal humerus fractures (PHF). However, the axillary view is frequently omitted because of pain and technical considerations. Furthermore, its diagnostic utility is unclear in this setting. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the rate of obtaining an adequate axillary X-ray and complete shoulder series at a level I trauma center, (2) understand the cost of ordering and attempting an axillary radiograph, and (3) determine if axillary radiographs influence the management of PHF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PHF treated between 2009 and 2011 that were ordered for an AP, scapular Y, and axillary view was identified. The types of radiographs actually obtained were recorded. The cost of obtaining three views and a single view of the shoulder with X-ray was determined. Lastly, three surgeons reviewed 42 PHF, both with and without an axillary view (AV), and treatment recommendations were compared.
RESULTS: 30% of PHF in this series had an adequate axillary view, and 14% received a complete trauma series. No factors could be identified that were associated with successfully obtaining an axillary view. Reviewers demonstrated substantial intraobserver reliability (κ = 0.759-0.808) regarding treatment recommendations for PHF with and without the axillary view. The addition of the AV had minimal influence on treatment recommendations.
CONCLUSION: Considering that the axillary view for PHF is painful, labor-intensive, costly, and does not appear to provide additional diagnostic value, orthopedic surgeons can consider foregoing the use of the axillary view when evaluating and treating PHF, particularly if other advanced imaging is utilized.

Entities:  

Keywords:  axillary view; proximal humerus fracture; radiograph

Year:  2015        PMID: 26981052      PMCID: PMC4773689          DOI: 10.1007/s11420-015-9445-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HSS J        ISSN: 1556-3316


  12 in total

1.  The modified axillary view of the shoulder, a painless alternative.

Authors:  Eric Geusens; Steven Pans; Dieter Verhulst; Peter Brys
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2006-05-11

2.  Radiographic appearance of displaced lesser tuberosity osteotomy: a case series.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Steven Kalandiak
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Axillary projection in radiography of the nontraumatized shoulder.

Authors:  A A De Smet
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: high incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception.

Authors:  Emilio Calvo; Diana Morcillo; Antonio M Foruria; Enrique Redondo-Santamaría; Fernando Osorio-Picorne; Jose R Caeiro
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Reliability and reproducibility of radiographs of greater tuberosity displacement. A cadaveric study.

Authors:  Bradford O Parsons; Steven J Klepps; Suzanne Miller; Justin Bird; James Gladstone; Evan Flatow
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  The roentgenographic evaluation of anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  H Pavlov; R F Warren; C B Weiss; D M Dines
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  [Diagnostic reliability of radiography in shoulder trauma. Considerations on the use and choice of more radiographic projections].

Authors:  N Prato; L Berri; G Bergamaschi; A Caneva; L E Derchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Accuracy of the axillary projection to determine fracture angulation of the proximal humerus.

Authors:  Jordan A Simon; Steven M Puopolo; Edward L Capla; Kenneth A Egol; Joseph D Zuckerman; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.390

9.  Indications for computed tomography (CT-) diagnostics in proximal humeral fractures: a comparative study of plain radiography and computed tomography.

Authors:  Christian Bahrs; Bernd Rolauffs; Norbert P Südkamp; Hagen Schmal; Christoph Eingartner; Klaus Dietz; Philippe L Pereira; Kuno Weise; Erich Lingenfelter; Peter Helwig
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Roentgenographic evaluation of suspected shoulder dislocation: a prospective study comparing the axillary view and the scapular 'Y' view.

Authors:  J P Silfverskiold; D J Straehley; W W Jones
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  2 in total

1.  Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly: Concomitant Fractures and Management.

Authors:  Kelly Zachariasen; Bradley R Dart; Elizabeth Ablah; Kelly Lightwine; James Haan
Journal:  Kans J Med       Date:  2020-05-21

2.  The Clinical Utility of Additional Axillary and Velpeau Radiographs in the Evaluation of Suspected Shoulder Trauma.

Authors:  Sebastian A Cruz; Hector Castillo; Ravi Theja V Chintapalli; Olufemi E Adams; Vince K Morgan; Jason L Koh; Michael J Lee; Lewis L Shi
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.884

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.