BACKGROUND: According to the future demographic trends the incidence of proximal humeral fractures and subsequent posttraumatic malunions and nonunions of the proximal humerus are expected to substantially increase. OBJECTIVES: This article reviews the indications, techniques and outcomes of corrective osteotomy for the treatment of posttraumatic nounions and malunions of the proximal humerus. METHODS: A selective literature search was performed and personal surgical experiences are reported. RESULTS: Malunions of the proximal humerus can occur after both surgical and conservative management of fractures. Due to the complex anatomy of the proximal humerus, malunions have to be systematically assessed regarding epiphyseal and metaphyseal malpositioning. Furthermore, the objective anatomical disorder has to be completely correlated with the subjective patient complaints. The associated soft tissue structures, such as the glenohumeral joint capsule and ligaments, long head of the biceps tendon, rotator cuff and muscles inserting in the metaphysis, can independently cause discomfort to the patient and need to be meticulously identified as such. CONCLUSION: A variety of corrective surgical strategies are available, which are indicated depending on the location and extent of the malunion. The depicted single-cut osteotomy technique represents an elegant therapeutic option for multidimensional deformities of the proximal humerus. Nonunions of the proximal humerus can usually be successfully managed with autologous cancellous bone grafting and locking plate osteosynthesis.
BACKGROUND: According to the future demographic trends the incidence of proximal humeral fractures and subsequent posttraumatic malunions and nonunions of the proximal humerus are expected to substantially increase. OBJECTIVES: This article reviews the indications, techniques and outcomes of corrective osteotomy for the treatment of posttraumatic nounions and malunions of the proximal humerus. METHODS: A selective literature search was performed and personal surgical experiences are reported. RESULTS: Malunions of the proximal humerus can occur after both surgical and conservative management of fractures. Due to the complex anatomy of the proximal humerus, malunions have to be systematically assessed regarding epiphyseal and metaphyseal malpositioning. Furthermore, the objective anatomical disorder has to be completely correlated with the subjective patient complaints. The associated soft tissue structures, such as the glenohumeral joint capsule and ligaments, long head of the biceps tendon, rotator cuff and muscles inserting in the metaphysis, can independently cause discomfort to the patient and need to be meticulously identified as such. CONCLUSION: A variety of corrective surgical strategies are available, which are indicated depending on the location and extent of the malunion. The depicted single-cut osteotomy technique represents an elegant therapeutic option for multidimensional deformities of the proximal humerus. Nonunions of the proximal humerus can usually be successfully managed with autologous cancellous bone grafting and locking plate osteosynthesis.