Literature DB >> 17701179

Relative validity of the modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (M-ASES) questionnaire using item response theory.

Chad Cook1, Eric Hegedus, Adam Goode, Curtis Mina, Ricardo Pietrobon, Lawrence D Higgins.   

Abstract

The modified American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon's (M-ASES) questionnaire is purported to be a non-region specific functional measure of the entire upper extremity. The purpose of this study was to determine the factor structure of the M-ASES and to determine item-fit of the M-ASES using item response theory (IRT). Analyses included univariate baseline demographics, factor analysis, convergent/construct validation with the SF-12, and graded response IRT of the M-ASES. 964 patients of an orthopedic practice with a variety of upper extremity dysfunctions participated in this trial. The M-ASES demonstrated two dimensions (wrist/hand and shoulder dysfunction) and exhibited excellent discrimination and threshold specification. The instrument correlated well with the mental and physical dimensions of the SF-12. The M-ASES should be considered an excellent tool for measure of whole upper extremity dysfunction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17701179     DOI: 10.1007/s00296-007-0420-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatol Int        ISSN: 0172-8172            Impact factor:   2.631


  21 in total

1.  Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  R D Hays; L S Morales; S P Reise
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Item response theory and its applications to patient-reported outcomes measurement.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Chang; Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Eval Health Prof       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ricardo Pietrobon; Remy R Coeytaux; Timothy S Carey; William J Richardson; Robert F DeVellis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-03-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Outcome instruments for the assessment of the upper extremity following trauma: a review.

Authors:  Adam S Dowrick; Belinda J Gabbe; Owen D Williamson; Peter A Cameron
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.586

6.  The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; J F Lu; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  An activities index for use with stroke patients.

Authors:  M Holbrook; C E Skilbeck
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 10.668

Review 9.  Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  S D M Bot; C B Terwee; D A W M van der Windt; L M Bouter; J Dekker; H C W de Vet
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  Cross-sectional and longitudinal construct validity of two rotator cuff disease-specific outcome measures.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Andrea Bean; Varda van Osnabrugge; Joy C MacDermid; Richard Holtby
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Clinimetrics corner: the Global Rating of Change Score (GRoC) poorly correlates with functional measures and is not temporally stable.

Authors:  Craig Garrison; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2012-11

2.  Development of an item list to assess the forgotten joint concept in shoulder patients.

Authors:  Johannes M Giesinger; Nicolas Kesterke; David F Hamilton; Bernhard Holzner; Bernhard Jost; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Technological developments enable measuring and using patient-reported outcomes data in orthopaedic clinical practice.

Authors:  David F Hamilton; Johannes M Giesinger; Karlmeinrad Giesinger
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2020-12-18
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.