Literature DB >> 17698525

Pain improvement after intradiskal lidocaine administration in provocation lumbar diskography: association with diskographic contrast leakage.

W S Bartynski1, W E Rothfus.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Our aim was to evaluate the relationship of pain reduction, after intradiskal lidocaine administration during provocation lumbar diskography, to the presence of contrast leakage on postdiskographic imaging.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Intradiskal lidocaine was injected at 182 significantly painful disk levels in 111 patients. The clinical records and imaging studies were reviewed for response to the lidocaine injection and for the presence/absence of diskographic contrast leakage on postdiskographic images and CT. Pain response was assigned the following grades: 1) complete or substantial improvement, 2) partial improvement, or 3) no significant improvement after lidocaine administration. Fluoroscopic imaging and postdiskographic CT were evaluated for the presence or absence of contrast leakage.
RESULTS: Eighty-two (45%) significantly painful treated disks were contained, and 100 (55%) demonstrated contrast leakage. In leaking disks, 74 (74%) demonstrated complete or near-complete pain reduction after lidocaine administration, 15 (15%) demonstrated partial improvement, and 11 (11%) demonstrated no pain relief. In contained disks, 56 disks (69%) demonstrated no improvement after lidocaine administration, 9 (11%) demonstrating partial relief, and 17 (20%) demonstrated complete or substantial improvement. Results comparing leaking disks versus contained disks and complete versus no improvement were statistically significant (P<.001).
CONCLUSION: Painful disks exhibiting diskographic leakage tend to be highly responsive to intradiskal lidocaine administration, whereas painful disks without diskographic leakage tend not to improve. This observation has implications with respect to targeting the origin of a patient's back pain and may have specific implications with respect to choice of treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17698525      PMCID: PMC7977638          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  55 in total

1.  Which disc as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging is actually a source of pain? A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and discography.

Authors:  W C Horton; T K Daftari
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  The ontogenetic development of nerve terminations in the intervertebral discs of man. (Histology of intervertebral discs, 11th communication).

Authors:  J MALINSKY
Journal:  Acta Anat (Basel)       Date:  1959

3.  Fissuring of the posterior annulus fibrosus in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  W M Park; I W McCall; J P O'Brien; J K Webb
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Innervation of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  M A Edgar; J A Ghadially
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  A cadaveric study comparing discography, magnetic resonance imaging, histology, and mechanical behavior of the human lumbar disc.

Authors:  R Gunzburg; R Parkinson; R Moore; F Cantraine; W Hutton; B Vernon-Roberts; R Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Upregulated expression of chemokines in herniated nucleus pulposus resorption.

Authors:  H Haro; K Shinomiya; H Komori; A Okawa; I Saito; N Miyasaka; K Furuya
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  A gold standard evaluation of the "discogenic pain" diagnosis as determined by provocative discography.

Authors:  Eugene J Carragee; Todd Lincoln; Vik Singh Parmar; Todd Alamin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 8.  Lumbar discography. Position statement from the North American Spine Society Diagnostic and Therapeutic Committee.

Authors:  R D Guyer; D D Ohnmeiss
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Expression and distribution of tumor necrosis factor alpha in human lumbar intervertebral discs: a study in surgical specimen and autopsy controls.

Authors:  Christoph Weiler; Andreas G Nerlich; Beatrice E Bachmeier; Norbert Boos
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  The relative value of lumbar roentgenograms, metrizamide myelography, and discography in the assessment of patients with chronic low-back syndrome.

Authors:  S A Grubb; H J Lipscomb; W B Guilford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Peripheral disc margin shape and internal disc derangement: imaging correlation in significantly painful discs identified at provocation lumbar discography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 1.610

2.  Provocation lumbar diskography at previously fused levels.

Authors:  H S Dulai; W S Bartynski; W S Rothfus; P C Gerszten
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-10-25       Impact factor: 1.610

3.  Postdiskogram CT features of lidocaine-sensitive and lidocaine-insensitive severely painful disks at provocation lumbar diskography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus; M Kurs-Lasky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  In vivo effects of bupivacaine and gadobutrol on the intervertebral disc following discoblock and discography: a histological analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Berit M Pfitzner; Florian Streitparth; Tony Hartwig; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.