Literature DB >> 1579876

A cadaveric study comparing discography, magnetic resonance imaging, histology, and mechanical behavior of the human lumbar disc.

R Gunzburg1, R Parkinson, R Moore, F Cantraine, W Hutton, B Vernon-Roberts, R Fraser.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were 1) to compare discography and magnetic resonance imaging scanning on cadaver specimens and to correlate these imaging procedures by examining all the discs histologically; and 2) to study the extent to which the amplitude of rotational movement in the neutral and flexed position at a certain level correlates with the morphologic appearance of that disc. Twenty-four human lumbar spines were harvested from cadavers between the ages of 19 and 75 years. Each specimen underwent standard radiography, magnetic resonance imaging scanning, discography, histologic examination, and measurement of axial rotation in a torsion apparatus. For practical reasons, all specimens did not undergo all of the examinations. Not all peripheral anular lesions were detected by discography. Histology showed rim lesions of the anterior anulus in 18% of discs with normal discography. The overall incidence of anterior and posterior anular tears was greater in discs where larger amplitudes of rotation were observed. To which extent the one is a consequence of the other or vice versa is not clear. Magnetic resonance imaging was found to be less specific than discography. However, it must be emphasized that no axial magnetic resonance imaging scans were taken in this study. Discs with significantly decreased amounts of nuclear material (observed at histology) can still produce normal magnetic resonance imaging images. Infolding of the inner layers of the anulus fibrosus (33% anterior, 4% posterior) was a frequently observed feature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1579876     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199204000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  23 in total

1.  Discography: A Review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Review of existing grading systems for cervical or lumbar disc and facet joint degeneration.

Authors:  Annette Kettler; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Degeneration of the cervical disc: histology compared with radiography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Christe; R Läubli; R Guzman; U Berlemann; R J Moore; G Schroth; P Vock; K O Lövblad
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-09-01       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  The structural basis of interlamellar cohesion in the intervertebral disc wall.

Authors:  Celina A Pezowicz; Peter A Robertson; Neil D Broom
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Professor Barrie Vernon-Roberts, AO, MD, BSc, PhD, FRCPath, FRCPA, FAOrthA (Hon), FRS.SA.

Authors:  K D Rainsford; D R Haynes
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 4.473

6.  Grading of degenerative disk disease and functional impairment: imaging versus patho-anatomical findings.

Authors:  Ulrich Quint; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Postdiskogram CT features of lidocaine-sensitive and lidocaine-insensitive severely painful disks at provocation lumbar diskography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus; M Kurs-Lasky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  [Diagnostics and therapy of spinal disc herniation].

Authors:  A Zimmer; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Intervertebral disc lesions: visualisation with ultra-high field MRI at 11.7 T.

Authors:  Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Fabio Galbusera; Volker Rasche; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  A statistical model for intervertebral disc degeneration: determination of the optimal T2 cut-off values.

Authors:  S A Nagy; I Juhasz; H Komaromy; K Pozsar; I Zsigmond; G Perlaki; G Orsi; A Schwarcz; N Walter; T Doczi; P Bogner
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 3.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.