Literature DB >> 1385901

Which disc as visualized by magnetic resonance imaging is actually a source of pain? A correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and discography.

W C Horton1, T K Daftari.   

Abstract

Sixty-three discs in 25 consecutive patients with nonradicular discogenic pain were studied with magnetic resonance imaging and lumbar discography. Sagittal T2 magnetic resonance imaging sequences were blindly classified according to the nuclear signal intensity and to the status of the posterior anulus. A positive discogram had to include abnormal morphology and a provocative pain response of significant intensity and familiar quality. Specific magnetic resonance imaging patterns with a high probability for positive and negative discograms are identified. Also identified are magnetic resonance imaging patterns with intermediate probability, ie, ones that should not be presumed either asymptomatic or symptomatic. In many cases, magnetic resonance imaging could not reliably predict or replace discography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1385901     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199206001-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  14 in total

Review 1.  Discography.

Authors:  S R Anderson; B Flanagan
Journal:  Curr Rev Pain       Date:  2000

2.  Postdiskogram CT features of lidocaine-sensitive and lidocaine-insensitive severely painful disks at provocation lumbar diskography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus; M Kurs-Lasky
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Systematic review of tests to identify the disc, SIJ or facet joint as the source of low back pain.

Authors:  M J Hancock; C G Maher; J Latimer; M F Spindler; J H McAuley; M Laslett; N Bogduk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  The "dehydrated" lumbar intervertebral disk on MR, its anatomy, biochemistry and biomechanics.

Authors:  Vitcor Haughton
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Evidence for a Role of Nerve Injury in Painful Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: A Cross-Sectional Proteomic Analysis of Human Cerebrospinal Fluid.

Authors:  Tony K Y Lim; Kathleen M Anderson; Pawan Hari; Marcos Di Falco; Troy E Reihsen; George L Wilcox; Kumar G Belani; Sylvie LaBoissiere; Manuel R Pinto; David S Beebe; Lois J Kehl; Laura S Stone
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2017-06-24       Impact factor: 5.820

6.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: biological and biomechanical factors.

Authors:  Howard S An; Koichi Masuda; Nozomu Inoue
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Intradiscal methylene blue injection for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Baogan Peng; Yingmin Zhang; Shuxun Hou; Wenwen Wu; Xiaobing Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately predict concordant pain provocation during provocative disc injection?

Authors:  Chang Ho Kang; Yun Hwan Kim; Sang-Heon Lee; Richard Derby; Jung Hyuk Kim; Kyoo Byung Chung; Deuk Jae Sung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Pain improvement after intradiskal lidocaine administration in provocation lumbar diskography: association with diskographic contrast leakage.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; W E Rothfus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  MRI signal distribution within the intervertebral disc as a biomarker of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Julien Gervais; Delphine Périé; Stefan Parent; Hubert Labelle; Carl-Eric Aubin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.