| Literature DB >> 17697373 |
Peter R Teske1, Healy Hamilton, Conrad A Matthee, Nigel P Barker.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The importance of vicariance events on the establishment of phylogeographic patterns in the marine environment is well documented, and generally accepted as an important cause of cladogenesis. Founder dispersal (i.e. long-distance dispersal followed by founder effect speciation) is also frequently invoked as a cause of genetic divergence among lineages, but its role has long been challenged by vicariance biogeographers. Founder dispersal is likely to be common in species that colonize remote habitats by means of rafting (e.g. seahorses), as long-distance dispersal events are likely to be rare and subsequent additional recruitment from the source habitat is unlikely. In the present study, the relative importance of vicariance and founder dispersal as causes of cladogenesis in a circumglobally distributed seahorse lineage was investigated using molecular dating. A phylogeny was reconstructed using sequence data from mitochondrial and nuclear markers, and the well-documented closure of the Central American seaway was used as a primary calibration point to test whether other bifurcations in the phylogeny could also have been the result of vicariance events. The feasibility of three other vicariance events was explored: a) the closure of the Indonesian Seaway, resulting in sister lineages associated with the Indian Ocean and West Pacific, respectively; b) the closure of the Tethyan Seaway, resulting in sister lineages associated with the Indo-Pacific and Atlantic Ocean, respectively, and c) continental break-up during the Mesozoic followed by spreading of the Atlantic Ocean, resulting in pairs of lineages with amphi-Atlantic distribution patterns.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17697373 PMCID: PMC1978501 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Evol Biol ISSN: 1471-2148 Impact factor: 3.260
Figure 1Seahorse distribution ranges. Geographic distributions of species associated with the circumglobally distributed seahorse lineage (after Lourie et al. [61]).
Figure 2Phylogeny of the circumglobal seahorse lineage. The phylogenetic tree with the highest likelihood score reconstructed by means of likelihood ratcheting. The data matrix comprised five partitions: mitochondrial control region, cytochrome b and 16S rRNA, and nuclear S7 intron and Aldolase. Associations of lineages with biogeographic regions are indicated. Nodal support is indicated by three numbers; these represent bootstrap values from maximum likelihood searches, jackknife support from parsimony searches, and posterior probabilities from Bayesian Inference. Hyphens indicate clades that were not recovered using parsimony. White circles indicate divergence events that may have resulted from vicariance events. Letters within these correspond to those in Table 2.
Cytochrome b and 16S rRNA sequences of various teleost lineages whose geographic distributions may have resulted from the closures of the Central American, Indonesian and Tethyan seaways, or from continental break-up and spreading of the Atlantic Ocean. Pairwise Kimura 2-Parameter distances between lineages were plotted in Fig. 3.
| Molecular marker | Letter in Fig. 3 | Lineage 1 | Lineage 2 | Accession numbers | Reference |
| Cytochrome | A | 118 | |||
| B | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| C | Perez et al., unpubl. | ||||
| D | 28 | ||||
| E | 23 | ||||
| F | 72 | ||||
| G | 97 | ||||
| H | 39 | ||||
| I | 39 | ||||
| J | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| K | 42 | ||||
| L | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| M | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| N | 119 | ||||
| O | 120 | ||||
| P | 121 | ||||
| Q | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| R | 121 | ||||
| S | 97 | ||||
| T | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| U | 98 | ||||
| V | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| W | 98 | ||||
| X | 120 | ||||
| 16S rRNA | A | 61 | |||
| B | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| C | 61 | ||||
| D | 23 | ||||
| E | 23 | ||||
| F | 86 | ||||
| G | 122,123 | ||||
| H | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| I | 42 | ||||
| J | Seyoum et al., unpubl.; 124 | ||||
| K | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| L | 120 | ||||
| M | 61 | ||||
| N | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| O | 61 | ||||
| P | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| Q | (see Table 3) | (this study) | |||
| R | (Not yet available) | 98 | |||
| S | 97 | ||||
| T | Not on GenBank | 98 | |||
| U | 120 | ||||
| V | (see Table 3) | (this study) |
Figure 3Genetic distances among geminate teleost species. Pairwise Kimura 2-Parameter distances [104] between lineages of seahorses (white squares) and other teleost species (black squares) whose present-day distribution patterns indicate that they may have diverged as a result of the closures of the Central American, Indonesian, or Tethyan seaways, or as result of continental break-up and spreading of the Atlantic Ocean. A: Cytochrome b sequences; B: 16S rRNA sequences. Letters represent teleost lineages listed in Table 1. The black arrow indicates the pairwise distance between the two seahorses lineages hypothesized to have diverged as a result of closure of the Central American Seaway. These lineages were used to estimate divergence times in Table 2. White arrows indicate distances between lineages whose divergence time estimates matched published dates for the closures of the Indonesian and Tethyan seaways (Table 2). Asterisks indicate teleost lineages whose evolutionary rate differed from that of the seahorses (A: N), whose rates were not tested because a different portion of 16S rRNA was sequenced (B: A, C, M, O) or which were used as outgroup in relative rate tests (A: P, R; B: J).
Divergence time estimates among seahorse lineages whose cladogenesis may have been the result of vicariance events by virtue of the present-day distribution patterns of their species.
| Node | ||||||
| Calibration range | B | C | D | E | F | G |
| 3.1 – 3.5 | 3.73 ± 0.29 | 3.67 ± 0.42 | 15.12 ± 3.46 | 1.47 ± 0.53 | 5.33 ± 1.79 | 14.60 ± 3.37 |
| (2.26 – 5.84) | (3.18 – 4.76) | (9.85 – 23.26) | (0.54 – 2.61) | (2.64 – 9.47) | (9.53 – 22.49) | |
| 3.1 – 4.6 | 4.26 ± 1.15 | 4.16 ± 0.66 | 16.60 ± 4.00 | 1.66 ± 0.63 | 6.01 ± 2.13 | 16.05 ± 3.89 |
| (2.46 – 6.94) | (3.24 – 5.70) | (10.50 – 26.05) | (0.60 ± 3.04) | (2.89 – 11.14) | (10.09 – 25.22) | |
| 3.1 – 8.5 | 5.15 ± 1.92 | 5.03 ± 1.50 | 19.07 ± 5.76 | 2.02 ± 0.94 | 7.18 ± 3.07 | 18.46 ± 5.63 |
| (2.60 – 9.98) | (3.27 – 8.75) | (11.04 – 33.05) | (0.66 – 4.31) | (3.07 – 14.87) | (10.60 – 32.16) | |
Divergence times were estimated using the program MULTIDIVTIME [102] under the assumption that the closure of the Central American Seaway (Node A in Fig. 2) resulted in the divergence of two sister lineages associated with the eastern/central Pacific (Hippocampus ingens and H. fisheri) and Atlantic Oceans (H. reidi and H. algiricus), respectively. Phylogeographic distribution patterns may have been the result of the following vicariance events. Node B (Indian Ocean vs. West Pacific): Closure of the Indonesian Seaway. Nodes C and D (Indo-Pacific vs. Atlantic Ocean): Closure of the Tethyan Seaway. Node E, F and G (amphi-Atlantic distribution patterns): continental break-up and spreading of the Atlantic Ocean. Three possible calibration ranges for the closure of the Central American Seaway were specified. Comparisons of the species affected by this vicariance event with other teleosts having similar distribution patterns (Fig. 3) indicate that the seahorses were among the last to diverge. This suggests that their cladogenesis was associated with the final closure of the seaway, i.e. no earlier than approximately 4.6 mya (a hypothesis that is further supported by the finding that marine organisms in nearshore habitats were among the last species to have diverged as a result of Central American seaway closure [20,60,61]). Divergence time estimates are indicated as mean ± S.D. (95% confidence interval). Suggested dates of vicariance events: Central American Seaway closure: 3.1 – 3.5 mya (assuming that the divergence of the transisthmian seahorse lineages took place when a land bridge formed in Central America [18]); 3.1 – 4.6 (taking into consideration that seahorse divergence may have been affected by the reorganisation of ocean currents associated with the closure of the seaway [24]); 3.1 – 8.5 mya (the upper bound being the time when the earliest recorded evolution associated with the closure of the seaway took place in marine corals and foraminiferans [25]); Indonesian Seaway closure: 0.01 – 1.8 [47,48]; 3 – 4 mya [46]; 7 – 10 mya [44,45]; 15 – 17 mya [43]; Tethyan Seaway closure: 11.2 – 14.8 mya [34,35]; 18.4 – 20.5 [36]; 23.8 – 28.5 [31]; complete separation of the land masses on either side of the Atlantic Ocean: 84 mya [50].
Figure 4Chronogram of the circumglobal seahorse clade. An ultrametric tree of the circumglobally distributed seahorse lineage scaled to geological time constructed using the program MULTIDIVTIME [57]. White circles indicate nodes that were used to calibrate the molecular clock; letters within these correspond to the ones used in Fig. 2. Time intervals used for calibration were: A: 3.1 – 4.6 mya; B: 3.0 – 4.0 mya; D: 11.2 – 20.5 mya. Grey bars indicate 95% confidence intervals of internal nodes.
Samples used in this study, including species names, collection localities, collectors or museums that contributed samples and GenBank accession numbers.
| GenBank accession numbers | |||||||
| Species | Collection locality | Collector/Museum | Control region | Cytochrome b | 16S rRNA | S7 intron | Aldolase |
| Ingroup: | |||||||
| Benin (*Ghana) | Z. Sohou, | ||||||
| Benin | *J. Macpherson | ||||||
| South Africa | P. Teske | ||||||
| USA (Gulf of Mexico) | FM | ||||||
| Colombia | H. Hamilton | ||||||
| Hawaii | H. Hamilton | ||||||
| Hawaii | H. Hamilton | ||||||
| Egypt (Red Sea) | H. Gabr | ||||||
| Italy (*Portugal) | PS, *J. Curtis | ||||||
| Italy (Portugal*) | PS | ||||||
| Israel (Mediterranean) | B. Galil | ||||||
| Ecuador | H. Hamilton | ||||||
| Mexico (East Pacific) | J. Baum | ||||||
| Peru | PS | ||||||
| USA (East Pacific) | H. Hamilton | ||||||
| Vietnam | PS | ||||||
| Fiji | H. Hamilton | ||||||
| India | A. Sreepada | ||||||
| Indonesia | S. Lourie | ||||||
| Philippines | M. Santos | ||||||
| Brazil (aquarium trade) | L. Smith | ||||||
| Honduras | H. Hamilton | ||||||
| USA (Gulf of Mexico) | PS | ||||||
| Philippines | S. Lourie | ||||||
| USA (Gulf of Mexico) | FM | ||||||
| USA (Gulf of Mexico) | FM | ||||||
| Outgroup: | |||||||
| Australia | AM | ||||||
| Philippines | N. Perante | ||||||
| Japan | T. Mukai | ||||||
Sequences in boldface were used to reconstruct phylogenies. All sequences except those of Aldolase were used for molecular dating. Cytochrome b sequences whose accession numbers start with AF are 423 bp longer than those starting with DQ and were used to reconstruct phylogenies. Control region, cytochrome b and 16S rRNA are mitochondrial markers, S7 intron and Aldolase are nuclear markers. In some cases, samples from two different localities were used to represent a particular species.
FM = Florida Museum, PS = Project Seahorse, AM = Australian Museum
*Collection locality, collector, and accession number of the less frequently used sample