Literature DB >> 17696584

Criteria revision and performance comparison of three methods of signal detection applied to the spontaneous reporting database of a pharmaceutical manufacturer.

Yasuyuki Matsushita1, Yasufumi Kuroda, Shinpei Niwa, Satoshi Sonehara, Chikuma Hamada, Isao Yoshimura.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Several statistical methods exist for detecting signals of potential adverse drug reactions in spontaneous reporting databases. However, these signal-detection methods were developed using regulatory databases, which contain a far larger number of adverse event reports than the databases maintained by individual pharmaceutical manufacturers. Furthermore, the composition and quality of the spontaneous reporting databases differ between regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical companies. Thus, the signal-detection criteria proposed for regulatory use are considered to be inappropriate for pharmaceutical industry use without modification. The objective of this study was to revise the criteria for signal detection to make them suitable for use by pharmaceutical manufacturers.
METHODS: A model comprising 40 drugs and 1000 adverse events was constructed based on a spontaneous reporting database provided by a pharmaceutical company and used in a simulation to investigate appropriate criteria for signal detection. In total, 1000 pseudo datasets were generated with this model, and three statistical methods (proportional reporting ratio [PRR], Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network [BCPNN] and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker [MGPS]) for signal detection were applied to each dataset. The sensitivity and specificity of each method were evaluated using these pseudo datasets. The optimum critical value for signal detection (i.e. the value that achieved the highest sensitivity with 95% specificity) was identified for each method. The optimum values were also examined with the adverse events classified into two categories according to frequency. The three original detection methods and their revised versions were applied to a real pharmaceutical company database to detect 173 known adverse reactions of four drugs.
RESULTS: The 1000 pseudo datasets consisted of an average of 81 862 reports and 11,407 drug-event pairs, including 1192 adverse drug reactions. The sensitivities of PRR, BCPNN and MGPS methods were 49%, 45% and 26%, respectively, whereas their specificities were 95%, 99.6% and 99.99%, respectively; these sensitivities were unacceptably low for pharmaceutical manufacturers, whereas the specificities were acceptable. The highest sensitivity for each method, obtained by changing critical values and maintaining specificity at 95%, was 44%, 62% and 62%, respectively. When adverse events were classified into two categories, sensitivities as high as 75% for regular events and 39% for rare events were achieved with the revised BCPNN method. The critical values of the information component minus two standard deviations (IC - 2SD) index of the revised BCPNN method were greater than -0.7 for regular events and greater than -0.6 for rare events. The revised BCPNN method yielded 51% sensitivity and 89% specificity for the real dataset.
CONCLUSION: A lower critical value may be needed when signal-detection methodology is applied to the spontaneous reporting databases of pharmaceutical manufacturers. For example, it is recommended that pharmaceutical manufacturers use the BCPNN method with IC - 2SD criteria of greater than -0.7 for regular events and greater than -0.6 for rare events.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17696584     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-200730080-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of data mining methodologies using Japanese spontaneous reports.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Kubota; Daisuke Koide; Toshiki Hirai
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Introducing triage logic as a new strategy for the detection of signals in the WHO Drug Monitoring Database.

Authors:  M Ståhl; M Lindquist; I R Edwards; E G Brown
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  From association to alert--a revised approach to international signal analysis.

Authors:  M Lindquist; I R Edwards; A Bate; H Fucik; A M Nunes; M Ståhl
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Impact analysis of signals detected from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting data.

Authors:  Patrick Waller; Emma Heeley; Jane Moseley
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Evaluation of statistical association measures for the automatic signal generation in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Emmanuel Roux; Frantz Thiessard; Annie Fourrier; Bernard Bégaud; Pascale Tubert-Bitter
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2005-12

Review 6.  Perspectives on the use of data mining in pharmaco-vigilance.

Authors:  June Almenoff; Joseph M Tonning; A Lawrence Gould; Ana Szarfman; Manfred Hauben; Rita Ouellet-Hellstrom; Robert Ball; Ken Hornbuckle; Louisa Walsh; Chuen Yee; Susan T Sacks; Nancy Yuen; Vaishali Patadia; Michael Blum; Mike Johnston; Charles Gerrits; Harry Seifert; Karol Lacroix
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation.

Authors:  A Bate; M Lindquist; I R Edwards; S Olsson; R Orre; A Lansner; R M De Freitas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 8.  Harmonisation in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  I R Edwards; C Biriell
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.606

9.  Drug attributed alterations in potassium handling in congestive cardiac failure.

Authors:  D H Lawson; P C O'Connor; H Jick
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 10.  Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.

Authors:  Lorna Hazell; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

View more
  15 in total

1.  Implementation of an automated signal detection method in the French pharmacovigilance database: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Véronique Pizzoglio; Ismaïl Ahmed; Pascal Auriche; Pascale Tuber-Bitter; Françoise Haramburu; Carmen Kreft-Jaïs; Ghada Miremont-Salamé
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  The 'power' of signal-detection algorithms.

Authors:  M Rezaul Karim; Stephen L Klincewicz; Chuen L Yee
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Early detection of pharmacovigilance signals with automated methods based on false discovery rates: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ismaïl Ahmed; Frantz Thiessard; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Françoise Haramburu; Carmen Kreft-Jais; Bernard Bégaud; Pascale Tubert-Bitter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Choosing thresholds for statistical signal detection with the proportional reporting ratio.

Authors:  Jim Slattery; Yolanda Alvarez; Ana Hidalgo
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Prospective data mining of six products in the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: disposition of events identified and impact on product safety profiles.

Authors:  Steven Bailey; Ajay Singh; Robert Azadian; Peter Huber; Michael Blum
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Comparative analysis of pharmacovigilance methods in the detection of adverse drug reactions using electronic medical records.

Authors:  Mei Liu; Eugenia Renne McPeek Hinz; Michael Edwin Matheny; Joshua C Denny; Jonathan Scott Schildcrout; Randolph A Miller; Hua Xu
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Reporting of adverse events following immunizations in Ghana - Using disproportionality analysis reporting ratios.

Authors:  Daniel N A Ankrah; Delese M Darko; George Sabblah; Aukje Mantel-Teeuwisse; Hubert M G Leufkens
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Arrhythmia associated with buprenorphine and methadone reported to the Food and Drug Administration.

Authors:  David P Kao; Mark C P Haigney; Philip S Mehler; Mori J Krantz
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 6.526

9.  Pharmacovigilance evaluation of the relationship between impaired glucose metabolism and BCR-ABL inhibitor use by using an adverse drug event reporting database.

Authors:  Naoto Okada; Takahiro Niimura; Yoshito Zamami; Hirofumi Hamano; Shunsuke Ishida; Mitsuhiro Goda; Kenshi Takechi; Masayuki Chuma; Masaki Imanishi; Keisuke Ishizawa
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Data mining of the public version of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Sakaeda; Akiko Tamon; Kaori Kadoyama; Yasushi Okuno
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.