Literature DB >> 22143912

Implementation of an automated signal detection method in the French pharmacovigilance database: a feasibility study.

Véronique Pizzoglio1, Ismaïl Ahmed, Pascal Auriche, Pascale Tuber-Bitter, Françoise Haramburu, Carmen Kreft-Jaïs, Ghada Miremont-Salamé.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In France, early detection of adverse effects does not currently involve any automatic signal detection method. The present objective was to assess the feasibility and measure the potential benefit of the incorporation of an automatic signal detection tool (GPS(pH0)) in the French pharmacovigilance system.
METHODS: GPS(pH0) was first applied to the data collected from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2008 and then to the data collected from 1 January 2000 to 31 March 2009. A total of 1,414 original signals were detected. They were shared out for further expertise among 32 centres, i.e. the 31 Regional Pharmacovigilance Centres and the French medicine agency (AFSSAPS) pharmacovigilance department.
RESULTS: The participating centres (n = 28) analysed 1,292 signals in May 2009. Overall, 277 signals whether known or unknown were thus considered worth following up. Half of the other 893 categorised signals were "well-known" (35.7%) and non-interpretable/non-pertinent signals (36.6%); 4% were not categorised because of a lack of time. Analysis of the signals was time-consuming, but the working time estimated by the participants was highly variable (median time: 6 h; minimum: 2 h maximum: 26 h).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study are in favour of the integration of an automated signal detection tool to complement the current pharmacovigilance activities. The Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical for drug classification poses difficulties in many situations; the international proprietary name might be more efficient. The variability observed in the time needed for analysis suggests that a standardised methodology should be employed. Overall, the findings of this prospective study will contribute to refining the signal management procedure to be implemented in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22143912     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1178-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  27 in total

1.  Extending the methods used to screen the WHO drug safety database towards analysis of complex associations and improved accuracy for rare events.

Authors:  G Niklas Norén; Andrew Bate; Roland Orre; I Ralph Edwards
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Systematic investigation of time windows for adverse event data mining for recently approved drugs.

Authors:  Alan M Hochberg; Manfred Hauben; Ronald K Pearson; Donald J O'Hara; Stephanie J Reisinger
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.126

Review 3.  Quantitative signal detection using spontaneous ADR reporting.

Authors:  A Bate; S J W Evans
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Early detection of pharmacovigilance signals with automated methods based on false discovery rates: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ismaïl Ahmed; Frantz Thiessard; Ghada Miremont-Salamé; Françoise Haramburu; Carmen Kreft-Jais; Bernard Bégaud; Pascale Tubert-Bitter
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Spontaneous reporting: how many cases are required to trigger a warning?

Authors:  P Tubert; B Bégaud; F Haramburu; J C Péré
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  A Bayesian neural network method for adverse drug reaction signal generation.

Authors:  A Bate; M Lindquist; I R Edwards; S Olsson; R Orre; A Lansner; R M De Freitas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Reports of hypoglycaemia associated with the use of ACE inhibitors and other drugs: a case/non-case study in the French pharmacovigilance system database.

Authors:  N Moore; C Kreft-Jais; F Haramburu; C Noblet; M Andrejak; M Ollagnier; B Bégaud
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.335

8.  Comparing the toxicity of two drugs in the framework of spontaneous reporting: a confidence interval approach.

Authors:  P Tubert-Bitter; B Begaud; Y Moride; A Chaslerie; F Haramburu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.437

9.  Time-to-signal comparison for drug safety data-mining algorithms vs. traditional signaling criteria.

Authors:  A M Hochberg; M Hauben
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Novel statistical tools for monitoring the safety of marketed drugs.

Authors:  J S Almenoff; E N Pattishall; T G Gibbs; W DuMouchel; S J W Evans; N Yuen
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.875

View more
  1 in total

1.  Useful Interplay Between Spontaneous ADR Reports and Electronic Healthcare Records in Signal Detection.

Authors:  Alexandra C Pacurariu; Sabine M Straus; Gianluca Trifirò; Martijn J Schuemie; Rosa Gini; Ron Herings; Giampiero Mazzaglia; Gino Picelli; Lorenza Scotti; Lars Pedersen; Peter Arlett; Johan van der Lei; Miriam C Sturkenboom; Preciosa M Coloma
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.606

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.