Literature DB >> 17342478

Perception of limb orientation in the vertical plane depends on center of mass rather than inertial eigenvectors.

Rolf van de Langenberg1, Idsart Kingma, Peter J Beek.   

Abstract

We performed two experiments to test the hypothesis that the perception of limb orientation depends on inertial eigenvectors (e(i)) against the alternative hypothesis that it depends on the center of mass vector (CM). Whereas e(i) constrains the dynamic torques involved in angular rotation, CM constrains the static torque necessary to keep the limb aloft in the gravitational field. Hence, possible effects of e(i) and CM on kinesthetic judgments must be related to the dynamic and static torques, respectively, involved in moving and positioning a limb. In the first experiment, blindfolded participants matched, with upper arms supported, the orientation of their forearms while the forearms' e(i) and CM were manipulated relative to the elbow. The manipulation of the vector CM alone induced a matching bias, as did the combined manipulation of e(i) and CM, whereas the manipulation of e(i) alone did not. In the second experiment, participants positioned their unseen and unsupported right arm at an indicated spatial configuration while e(i) and CM of the right forearm were manipulated as in Experiment 1. As in the first experiment, forearm positioning was affected by the independent manipulation of CM and the combined manipulation of e(i) and CM, but not by the independent variation of e(i). Moreover, none of the manipulations affected upper arm positioning. These results refute the claim that the perception of limb orientation (in the vertical plane) is based on e(i)and demonstrate, for the first time, the implication of a limb segment's CM in the perception of its orientation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17342478      PMCID: PMC1914263          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0891-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  30 in total

1.  Revisited: the inertia tensor as a proprioceptive invariant in humans.

Authors:  C M Craig; C Bourdin
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2002-01-11       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Inertial constraints on limb proprioception are independent of visual calibration.

Authors:  M A Riley; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Proprioceptive population coding of limb position in humans.

Authors:  Edith Ribot-Ciscar; Mikael Bergenheim; Frédéric Albert; Jean-Pierre Roll
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Effect of positioning and bracing on passive position sense of shoulder joint.

Authors:  B Ulkar; B Kunduracioglu; C Cetin; R S Güner
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 5.  Human orientation and movement control in weightless and artificial gravity environments.

Authors:  J R Lackner; P DiZio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The perception of limb orientation depends on the center of mass.

Authors:  Rolf van de Langenberg; Idsart Kingma; Peter J Beek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Proprioceptive illusions induced by muscle vibration: contribution by muscle spindles to perception?

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-03-24       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Characteristics of knee joint receptors in the cat.

Authors:  P R Burgess; F J Clark
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Human forearm position sense after fatigue of elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  L D Walsh; C W Hesse; D L Morgan; U Proske
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-06-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Evaluation of shoulder proprioception following muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Hung-Maan Lee; Jiann-Jong Liau; Cheng-Kung Cheng; Chuan-Ming Tan; Jui-Tien Shih
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  2 in total

1.  A new paradigm for human stick balancing: a suspended not an inverted pendulum.

Authors:  Kwee-Yum Lee; Nicholas O'Dwyer; Mark Halaki; Richard Smith
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Does the integration of haptic and visual cues reduce the effect of a biased visual reference frame on the subjective head orientation?

Authors:  Marc Gueguen; Nicolas Vuillerme; Brice Isableu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.