Literature DB >> 17685803

Staying focused: a functional account of perceptual suppression during binocular rivalry.

Derek H Arnold1, Philip M Grove, Thomas S A Wallis.   

Abstract

Presenting different images to either eye can induce perceptual switching, with alternating disappearances of each image--a phenomenon called binocular rivalry. We believe that disappearances during binocular rivalry can be driven by a process that facilitates visibility near the point of fixation. As the point of fixation is tied neither to a particular stimulus nor to a specific eye, indifference to both would be an essential characteristic for the process we envisage. Many factors that influence disappearances during binocular rivalry scale with distance in depth from fixation. Of these, here we use blur. We break the links between this cue and both eye of origin and stimulus type. We find that perceptual dominance can track a better focused image as it is swapped between the eyes and that perceptual switches can be driven by alternating the focus of images fixed in each eye. This implies that, as a determinant of suppression selectivity, blur is functionally independent from both eye of origin and stimulus type. Our data and theoretical account suggest that binocular rivalry is not an irrelevant laboratory curiosity but, rather, that it is a product of a functional adaptation that promotes visibility in cluttered environments.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17685803     DOI: 10.1167/7.7.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  15 in total

1.  Endogenous attention selection during binocular rivalry at early stages of visual processing.

Authors:  Jyoti Mishra; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 2.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Advantage of binocularity in the presence of external visual noise.

Authors:  Joanna M Otto; Michael Bach; Guntram Kommerell
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Individual differences in sensory eye dominance reflected in the dynamics of binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Kevin C Dieter; Jocelyn L Sy; Randolph Blake
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Single neural code for blur in subjects with different interocular optical blur orientation.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Lucie Sawides; Carlos Dorronsoro; Eli Peli; Susana Marcos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  A cyclopean neural mechanism compensating for optical differences between the eyes.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Carlos Dorronsoro; Lucie Sawides; Michael A Webster; Susana Marcos
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Adaptation to interocular differences in blur.

Authors:  Elysse Kompaniez; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos; Michael A Webster
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Why is Binocular Rivalry Uncommon? Discrepant Monocular Images in the Real World.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  I Agree: Binocular Rivalry Stimuli are Common but Rivalry is Not.

Authors:  Derek Henry Arnold
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  The spatial origin of a perceptual transition in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Marnix Naber; Frans A J Verstraten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.