Literature DB >> 1768552

Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution.

C Jewkes1, J W Sear, F Verhoeff, D J Sanders, P Foëx.   

Abstract

The performance and reproducibility of the BoMED NCCOM3 thoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiograph (TEB) has been evaluated in volunteers and patients. In resting supine volunteers, we determined the coefficient of variability over short time periods (30 min) and over several days, and examined the effects of differences in electrode type and electrode placement. The mean (range) intra-subject coefficients of variation (CV) for thoracic fluid index (TFI) and stroke volume (SV) were 1.0% (0.4-1.8%) and 4.7% (2.1-8.5%), respectively over a 30-min period. The corresponding CV were 5.6% (2.3-10.9%) and 10.9% (6.1-14.8%) for measurements made at rest on four separate occasions. Use of different electrode types (RedDot and Medicotest) resulted in differences in TFI (P less than 0.01), but not in mean values for SV or cardiac output (Q); their use in individual subjects revealed differences of up to 20% in SV and Q. Alterations in electrode placement by 5 cm in the horizontal and diagonal planes produced no significant changes in TFI, SV or Q; changes in the longitudinal plane produced a graded change. Increases of 5 cm and 10 cm in thoracic length produced mean increases in TFI of 9.8% and 39.8%, respectively, and mean decreases in Q of 8.4% and 16.7% and SV of 7.5% and 15.8%. TEB measurements of Q and SV were compared with thermodilution (TD) in 16 intensive care patients. Mean (SEM) Q by TEB was 5.63 (1.10) litre min-1 compared with TD 4.38 (0.72) litre min-1 (P less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1768552     DOI: 10.1093/bja/67.6.788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  9 in total

1.  Thoracic geometry and its relation to electrical current distribution: consequences for electrode placement in electrical impedance cardiography.

Authors:  E Raaijmakers; T J Faes; H G Goovaerts; J H Meijer; P M de Vries; R M Heethaar
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of intrathecal meperidine, meperidine-bupivacaine mixture and hyperbaric bupivacaine.

Authors:  F Conway; L A Critchley; J C Stuart; R C Freebairn
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 5.  Impedance cardiography: more questions than answers.

Authors:  David J Wang; Stephen S Gottlieb
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2006-09

6.  Aortocaval compression in the sitting and lateral decubitus positions during extradural catheter placement in the parturient.

Authors:  P J Andrews; W E Ackerman; M M Juneja
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Short-term postural reflexes in diabetic patients with autonomic dysfunction.

Authors:  Y Zhang; L A Critchley; Y H Tam; B Tomlinson
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2003-12-03       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  Impedance cardiography: more questions than answers.

Authors:  David J Wang; Stephen S Gottlieb
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Noninvasive cardiac output measurement by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence: influence of age and gender.

Authors:  Talakad N Sathyaprabha; Cauchy Pradhan; G Rashmi; Kandavel Thennarasu; Trichur R Raju
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 2.502

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.