Literature DB >> 10367443

Thoracic geometry and its relation to electrical current distribution: consequences for electrode placement in electrical impedance cardiography.

E Raaijmakers1, T J Faes, H G Goovaerts, J H Meijer, P M de Vries, R M Heethaar.   

Abstract

In thoracic impedance cardiography (TIC) measurements the neck electrodes are often positioned at the basis of the neck, close to the neck-thorax transition. Theoretically, this neck-thorax transition will cause inhomogeneities in the current density and potential distribution. This was simulated using a 3D finite element method, solely representing the geometrical neck-thorax transition. The specific conductivity was 7 10(-3) (omega cm)-1 and the injected current was 1 mA. As expected, the model generated inhomogeneities in the current distribution at the neck-thorax transition, which reached as far as 5 cm into the neck and 20 cm into the thorax. These results are supported by in vivo measurements performed in 10 young male subjects, in which the position of the neck electrodes was varied. A two-way ANOVA revealed that the stroke volume of the lowest neck position was significantly different from the other positions. Small shifts in the position of the neck electrode resulted in large changes in impedance and stroke volume (127 to 82 ml for the Kubicek equation). To standardise the electrode position, the authors strongly recommend placement of the neck electrodes at least 6 cm above the clavicula.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 10367443     DOI: 10.1007/bf02524429

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  19 in total

1.  Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution.

Authors:  C Jewkes; J W Sear; F Verhoeff; D J Sanders; P Foëx
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Impedance cardiography using band and regional electrodes in supine, sitting, and during exercise.

Authors:  R P Patterson; L Wang; S B Raza
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Mapping the cardiogenic impedance signal on the thoracic surface.

Authors:  R P Patterson; L Wang; B Raza; K Wood
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Optimalisation of the spot electrode array in impedance cardiography.

Authors:  H H Woltjer; B W Arntzen; H J Bogaard; P M de Vries
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  The inaccuracy of Kubicek's one-cylinder model in thoracic impedance cardiography.

Authors:  E Raaijmakers; T J Faes; H G Goovaerts; P M de Vries; R M Heethaar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution. A preliminary report.

Authors:  D I Masaki; J S Greenspoon; J G Ouzounian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Problems of impedance cardiography.

Authors:  K Sakamoto; K Muto; H Kanai; M Iizuka
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Motion artifact from spot and band electrodes during impedance cardiography.

Authors:  M H Qu; Y J Zhang; J G Webster; W J Tompkins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: suitable for monitoring stroke volume during pregnancy?

Authors:  R M Heethaar; A C van Oppen; F A Ottenhoff; F A Brouwer; H W Bruinse
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.435

10.  Differential impedance plethysmography for measuring thoracic impedances.

Authors:  J H Meijer; J P Reulen; P L Oe; W Allon; L G Thijs; H Schneider
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of stroke volume index with three different bioimpedance algorithms: lack of agreement compared to thermodilution.

Authors:  Eric E C de Waal; Maurits K Konings; Cor J Kalkman; Wolfgang F Buhre
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 17.440

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.